If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Blind Love for Entertainment
Comments
The very first shot we get of this guy, right when he is introduced, is of his ass. He's bent over, shaking it to some song, and these chicks walk up. It does say a bit about his character, plus it also allows for a joke. .
Female is essentially the "default sex" ... with most of the useful parts. Male is what results if it is shunted off the female path early on... and the bits which would have been useful end up essentially as practically vestigial.
NOT that birds are necessarily different, despite the whole W/Z thingie they got going, and the difference about which one has the two copies and which has different.... They just ended up going about it backwards for some funny reason that I haven't bothered looking into. I mean heck old-times had it dictated by temperature and stuff... so... bleh.
It's kind of silly to suggest that a particular element of a work shouldn't be there unless it is absolutely essential to the plot. As it turns out, not every single work of fiction is really about telling a story (sometimes the plot is just there as something to base jokes on, or sometimes the main point of a movie is really just in having a lot of action scenes, with other things being extraneous), and even for those that are, you shouldn't necessarily expect that every single element is a vital part of it. You could take most of the jokes out of any given comedy movie and end up with a less funny version of the same story, but what would be the point?
I don't see much issue with fanservice as a concept, but its execution should be brought into question. At best, it should flow naturally into the work, such as being tied to characterisation, and be used sparingly. At worst, it can be pretty insulting to everyone at once.
It can appeal to people, sure.
and those people can overlook the flaws of the work.
But it still can bog down when it doesn't belong or fit naturally.
It comes down to females doing the bulk of the investment in the next generation, while the necessary male contribution is comparatively minor. Human society has developed in such a way as to essentially have the males pick up much of the slack (which for some reason lead to being in charge at some level)... but essentially, men only exist because the other half of the genome splicing has to go somewhere. Little wonder in many bugs, the male is just a tiny thing that exists to fuck and then die. Some never even eat.
Since humans have been around, Men have lived longer than females because of child bearing.
Is it any wonder why women stop being able to have babies around 60, but men can have children until the day they die?
I mean naturally humanity doesn't eat the males after copulation. It isn't helpful nor necessary. Males are marginally bigger than the females in this species due to secondary roles besides, so it wouldn't work very effectively.
Life just goes with what works, really. Spiders and the like don't have a complicated social life... so the male really is completely useless except as a snack after his business is done. Placental mammals are a bit of a funny case due to the weird way in which the young is allowed to begin its maturation... which sorta puts even more strain on the female parent and forces the males to perform a more extensive support role.
Looking at society, I don't really see it.
You can't say thay the male body is just undeveloped female bits because boys are born biologically male and there is no breakdown of metamorphosis in human beings (like the axototl) that spawns the degenerate male.
Men have their tackle for a reason. Likewise do women. One is not necessarily more important than the other because both bring what is needed for new life to the birthing table.
Both parts ARE necessary... but one just plays a whole helluva shorter necessary part than the other.
I mean honestly, if the reason you enjoy something is because "there's nothing wrong with it" ..
That's not enjoying a work, that's denial
And if "value" is a human fallacy, then misinterpreting anatomy is a fallacy as well.
I care, Soti. And if that's good enough for me, that's good enough for the rest of us who still see a point.
I will reccomend Buffy t.v.s
but that doesn't mean I post on TvT saying
"Super perfect special"
My "happy brain drugs" are wired directly into my "paranoia brain drugs"... which tend to neutralise them within milliseconds. Don't really care much for either.
as "better" than others... which once again doesn't mean a damned thing
to me.
Come off it. You do this just as much as anyone else.