If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Comments
No.
Unless Batman.
First, did you practice speaking or write up a draft of potential things to talk about? If you haven't, get going.
If you have however, then remove the notion of "failure" from your mind. Failure does not exist.
HNNNNNNNNNNG
I WISH I HAD PAID ATTENTION DURING JAPANESE
http://www.flickr.com/photos/22789525@N00/3455427872/in/set-72157616944737345/
I am amazed that men think they deserve credit for not raping women.
Second, that is a very sickly green color of frosting.
...Bet they don't have one that says, "Not a pedophile"!
I am amazed that men think they deserve credit for not raping women.
^ Actually, Malk, I think that's the point.
I'm pretty sure these are linked to on a trope page I once edited ages ago (don't ask me which). The cookies are by feminists and send up men who expect women to treat them as heroes for minimal acts of "feminism".
It's a depressing thought, since whilst I can guarantee that I've never raped anyone, I haven't really done much to resolve the child-care needs of working mothers, so I'm clearly never going to get laid by any passing feminists.
Should I watch Baccano! or Gungrave next?
I still have the whole second half of the last season to watch.
But it's kind of difficult, since I'm stuck on a crappy old netbook right now, since my good computer is busted. I can't really torrent and watch anything of decent quality. So, I'm pretty much stuck with what I have on DVD/Netflix instant for a while.
Thus, Gungrave or Baccano.
"ON A SLIGHTLY LESS CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC"
Why are people so preemptive?
Anyways, just got back from my philosophy final. A sample of my brain on philosophy:
You have a student doing questions for assignments and tests on a certain topic. The textbook and notes tell the student how to give a certain response to the questions on said assignments and tests. Eventually, the student gets so good at this "studying" that said student manages to answer nearly all the questions given and get an A+. Does the student exhibit understanding?
I wouldn't be surprised if several philosophy professors explained the Chinese Room this way.