Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Comments
Super Mario 64 isn't Mario anyway. It's a decent platformer crudely shoehorned into Mario 'verse.
Ocarina of Time isn't Zelda anyway. It's a decent action-adventure crudely shoehorned into Zelda 'verse.
Morrowind isn't TES anyway. It's a decent RPG crudely shoehorned into TES 'verse.
Team Fortress 2 isn't Team Fortress anyway. It's a decent shooter crudely shoehorned into Team Fortress 'verse.
Pokèmon Snap isn't Pokèmon anyway. It's a decent camera-sim crudely shoehorned into Pokèmon 'verse.
Metroid Prime isn't Metroid anyway. It's a decent Metroidvania crudely shoehorned into Metroid 'verse.
My point is that not every game in a series has to be the same game.
Mega Man Legends isn't Mega Man anyway. It's a decent 3D action game shoehorned into the Mega Man 'verse.
Final Fantasy Legend isn't Final Fantasy anyway. It's a decent RPG shoehorned into the Final Fantasy 'verse.
Castlevania Judgement isn't Castlevania anyway. It's a decent fighting game shoehorned into the Castlevania 'verse.
Valis X isn't Valis anyway. It's a hentai game shoehorned into the Valis 'verse.
That's actually true though.
That's why it's funny.
At the Landsmeet in Dragon Age.
Given that I'm wearing king Cailan's armor, I feel kind of awkward denying the false accusations that I killed him.
Well, its rumoured to be set in Mass rather than D.C.
>Judgment
>Decent Fighting Game
... c'mon, Glenn.
Just beat Spec Ops: The Line.
You know, when I saw the trailer for the game, I heard the phrase "There's a line men like us have to cross" which I don't believe appears in the actual game. The line made a bit irritated, because it sounded a lot like what people say to justify warcrimes.
It would seem the game agreed with me.
Did I just start a meme? Damn, I'm almost proud.
I actually want to play Pokemon X/Y now.
^^^That reminds me: in the part where Walker has to deal with the angry mob that killed Lugo, I think I either shot into the air or harmlessly meleed one of the people, but that made them disperse without bloodshed, and I got the achievement "A Line Held."
I did that too. It was a really good moment -- just about the only point in the game that lets you make an unambiguously good decision.
AS YOU SHOULD KRAKEN.
Subtle, NT. Subtle. (This is in reference to the new DMC, for the record.)
Wait
what?
...oh.
I am very sorry for saying that.
Maybe i should play it again and get buttmad at it again.
^^Mom says it's my turn to FUCK YOU
Okay, clearly there's some sort of bet going around The Walking Dead: Survival Instinct's marketing department regarding who can make the game look the worst, because the real first trailer is out, and it's less impressive than that glitchy, uneventful, unpolished leaked gameplay video that people thought was a trailer.
Y'know, at this point all they can do is indefinitely postpone the game until everybody forgets about it and they can quietly kill it off, like what I'm pretty sure is happening with the XCOM FPS.
Well, given that it's going to be out March 26 (which both means that they're almost finished is not much time to fix the obvious issues we've seen in footage thus far), I think that's not going to happen.
And I thought the XCOM FPS was dead.
I'm just going to leave this here.
Hm.
That looks cool, but ever since Dead Island, my policy on trailers has been that only the part that shows a portion of the game is important. And that...didn't appear to show any of the game.
Even the part that shows gameplay is relatively unimportant except in that it shows you what the in-game graphics and the interface look like (and I guess you can also tell what genre the game is). They don't generally do much to tell you whether it'll actually be fun or not though, so even the gameplay part is kind of... not worth worrying about too much.
Though I guess in that particular trailer, there's actually nothing that indicates that it even is a game at all except the ESRB message at the start, so in that respect it'd probably be better if it actually showed any gameplay...
Three missions in, I'm kind of shocked at how much I'm enjoying Halo 4.
Considering that it wasn't developed by Bungie and everything. And that it's the beginning of an entirely new trilogy. Those aren't generally good signs. But pretty much everything so far feels like an improvement.
I haven't jumped into multiplayer yet because I need to buy another network cable.
I've always kind of wondered how much Bungie had to do with the final product for Halo. I mean, before Microsoft came along, it was a Mac-exclusive RTS.
Dat teaser: reportedly the CD Projekt crew's taste for Cyberpunk comes from their sentiment for Cyberpunk 2020 the RPG, which was relatively popular around here in the 90's.