If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

TV Tropes - Enforced Crapsaccharine World

1456810

Comments

  • edited 2011-04-21 18:08:59
    Because you never know what you might see.
    >Wouldn't detracting from the wiki imply that there is quality writing on there?

    Come on, it's not that bad.  The articles tend to be fairly decently written by Internet standards, and I think they're entertaining and interesting.  Matter of opinion, I guess.

    >There's also the Troper's love of X TREME EXXAGERATION FOR EMOTIONAL AFFECT, If you don't cry reading this comment you have no soul, pointlessly using egregious when there are better words just for the sake of potholing to the drinking game, the continued existence of TT, and I'm sure I'll think of other things I dislike about tvtropes.
    >EDIT: Oh yes, Nightmare fuel pages of both varieties.

    OK, yeah, I actually agree with everything in this post; all that stuff does suck.  I can't deny that TV Tropes has a number of problems.

    >Again, no one is forcing people to read it.  But what current site policy is doing is forcing people to not write it.
    >Totally the same thing, right?


    Not really.  The wiki exists for the readers, not the tropers.  It's a collaborative project, not a forum.
  • Dangerously intelligent creative genius hampered by Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Handle with care.

    BaronGrackle, we're not "underemphasizing" Anime on the Mirror Wiki.  We're just not giving it the massive over-emphasis you're used to seeing on TV Tropes.  In short, we're treating Anime the same way the Japanese treat it:  as if it were just another bunch of cartoons.

    There's a difference.

  • Because you never know what you might see.
    You do realise that Eddie doesn't even like anime, and that we do treat it basically the same way as every other medium, right?

    The only reason it's listed separately from Western animation is because it's a different tradition with a different fandom, so the tropes tend to be slightly different.
  • edited 2011-05-02 12:05:39
    Dangerously intelligent creative genius hampered by Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Handle with care.

    Sure, I realize that's the official, stated reasoning behind separating out Anime from the rest of the cartoons.  We just don't agree with the reasoning.

    And you really don't treat it "basically the same way", because the "different traditions/different fandom" argument could be applied to separate out British animation from American, French from German, and so on and so forth.  They all have different traditions and different fandoms... so why don't you see French cartoons getting their own category?

    And if its a different medium, as I've also heard argued, then why aren't animated television shows separated out from other animated short subjects, like animated feature length films are?  And why are feature length Anime lumped in with Anime short subjects, instead of included in a special "Feature Length Anime" category, since its so different?

    No... despite the official reasons, I (and many others like me... I'm just the guy stupid enough to say things publically) believe that the reason for the over-emphasis of Anime on TV tropes lies not with official policy but with the vocal and hostile nature of the more enthusiastic members of Anime fandom present on the wiki.

    Its no secret that TV Tropes has a large and amazingly vocal population of wild-eyed Anime fanatics (and I do use that word intentionally... and am an Anime fan... a fact that will surprise people, no doubt) who have a tendency to cast any non-worshipful opinion on the subject of Japanese cartoons as "bashing".  I've seen these people claim that a Trope concept that, as far as we know, originated in Ancient Grecian literature, and claim that "the West cannot fully grasp it", or even name it.

    And the best proof of this is what happens when you suggest a renaming of "Nakama".

    So Eddie being an Anime fan or not is irrelevant, really.  Is all about the inmates running... or at least heavily influencing the running of... the asylum.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    so why don't you see French cartoons getting their own category?

    Not enough examples of them, probably.
  • edited 2011-05-02 12:07:18
    You can change. You can.
    It's because Anime/Manga and Western Animation/Comics use different tropes entirely. While they share some similar ones as they are both, at the end of the day animation and printed images with words, respectively, they are quite different. 

    Nakama is not renamed because of the Grandfather Clause and honestly, all this complaining is based on nothing but fandom and dislike of something.

    ^Not really. They just aren't that different. And they are western animation, in fact. Nobody is talking about "American Animation" even though they are the most important and prominent provider.
  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    Not to mention that Western culture and Eastern culture are more different than different subsets of Western culture.
  • edited 2011-05-02 12:13:26
    Dangerously intelligent creative genius hampered by Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Handle with care.

    ^^^ That is an argument I find legitimate, actually.

    ^^Yeah, amazing how often I've seen my counter-arguments brushed aside with "You just hate Anime" or something similar, as if its impossible for one to be critical of how Anime is handled on TV Tropes, only a hater.

    Every time I've seen the "used different tropes entirely" argument, I point out how many so-called "Anime Tropes" have non-Anime animated examples, which utterly destroys the "entirely different argument".  The number of truly Anime-exclusive tropes can be counted on both hands, I am willing to bet.

    And let us please be honest:  Nakama is not renamed because, in the words of Madrugada, every time someone brings it up it causes a "shitstorm", and the mods don't want to deal with it.  The "shitstorm" in question being the hail of angry posts from Anime fen who get violently offended at the very idea that Nakama be renamed.

    ^Then why don't we separate out musical examples into their various cultural categories?  Why not separate EVERYTHING into their various cultural categories.

    I'm sorry, but you're making a Special Pleading argument, and those are fallacious for a reason.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    • ^Not really. They just aren't that different. And they are western animation, in fact. Nobody is talking about "American Animation" even though they are the most important and prominent provider.

      -shrug- It was just a suggestion, I'd really have no clue if it's right or not.
  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    And let us please be honest: Nakama is not renamed because, in the words of Madrugada, every time someone brings it up it causes a "shitstorm", and the mods don't want to deal with it. The "shitstorm" in question being the hail of angry posts from Anime fen who get violently offended at the very idea that Nakama be renamed.
    Yeah, Nakama really could use a rename.
    Then why don't we separate out musical examples into their various cultural categories? Why not separate EVERYTHING into their various cultural categories. 
    I'm sorry, but you're making a Special Pleading argument, and those are fallacious for a reason.

    And you're assuming I think that's a bad idea.
  • ☭Unstoppable Sex Goddess☭
    Complaining About Genres of Shows You Dont Like, JackButler.
  • edited 2011-05-02 12:17:13
    Dangerously intelligent creative genius hampered by Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Handle with care.

    ^^No, I'm assuming that *I* think its a bad idea, because it overcomplicates things.

    ^ Speaking of assuming, who said I don't like Anime?  When did anyone *other* than someone who disagrees with me say I don't like Anime?

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    He does like them- he said so earlier, although he could be lying, I guess.
  • Dangerously intelligent creative genius hampered by Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Handle with care.

    If I were inclined to lie about anything, it wouldn't be that.  I can't see how lying about my enjoying Anime would benefit me anything.

    Granted I'm not some wild-eyed fanatic who views the entire world through Anime-colored glasses, either.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    Yeah, I can't see how you would benefit, either.

    I'm just saying that we can't verify it. Not that we really have any reason to doubt you, but... yeah.
  • He who laments and can't let go of the past is forever doomed to solitude.
    I love anime, and nakama I find odd a trope name. Camaraderie!
  • ☭Unstoppable Sex Goddess☭
    You know you could just not fixate on anime and only add the things you like to the wiki? Let other people decide what they want to put on there?
  • edited 2011-05-02 12:31:24
    You can change. You can.

    Yeah, amazing how often I've seen my counter-arguments brushed aside
    with "You just hate Anime" or something similar, as if its impossible
    for one to be critical of how Anime is handled on TV Tropes, only a hater.



    Dude, I've been criticizing how damn ubiquitous anime is since I got on
    TVT. It's all because of the entry pimps. And it's not like there aren't entry
    pimps for other stuff. Anime is just a genre. I've seen Buffy and Avatar being
    entry pimped even more than most anime, so...all you're doing is complaining
    about a relatively lesser problem. The moment I realized this I stopped
    complaining about it.



    mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black;mso-fareast-language:
    ES-CO"> 



    Every time I've seen the "used different tropes entirely"
    argument, I point out how many so-called "Anime Tropes" have
    non-Anime animated examples, which utterly destroys the "entirely
    different argument".  The number of truly Anime-exclusive tropes can
    be counted on both hands, I am willing to bet.



     They are anime tropes because they are originiated and most commonly
    used in anime. That doesn't mean that they are exclusive to anime. And there's
    the fact that as anime grows popular, more people in the west are willing to
    take inspiration from it. Which means more anime tropes out of context. It's
    the nature of media, really.



    And let us please be honest:  Nakama is not renamed because, in the
    words of Madrugada, every time someone brings it up it causes a
    "shitstorm", and the mods don't want to deal with it.  The
    "shitstorm" in question being the hail of angry posts from Anime fen
    who get violently offended at the very idea that Nakama be renamed.



     



    I've always said that every trope name that is nothing but a reference
    should be revised. And that we should keep the redirects. But it won't happen.
    And I learned to deal with it. the wiki has wrongs, yes, but it's not bad.  And
    those mistakes can be corrected if we pool our resources together.



    "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma;color:black;mso-fareast-language:
    ES-CO"> 



    "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma;color:black;mso-fareast-language:
    ES-CO">^Then why don't we separate out musical examples into their various
    cultural categories?  Why not separate EVERYTHING into their various
    cultural categories.
    mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma;
    color:black;mso-fareast-language:ES-CO">



    mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black;mso-fareast-language:
    ES-CO"> 



    mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black;mso-fareast-language:
    ES-CO">Because we do? At least, we do with our music specific tropes...



    mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black;mso-fareast-language:
    ES-CO"> 

  • Dangerously intelligent creative genius hampered by Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Handle with care.

    @Vorpy: That's precisely what I do, actually.

    @Juan: When I realized it and stopped complaining, I started my own wiki.  Same problem, different solutions.

    As for "originated with Anime", in a lot of cases, the non-Anime animated examples predate the flood of Anime into western culture.  Are you saying that the Flintstones, to pick a name out of the air, was influenced by Anime?  And you'll excuse me, but you said "different tropes entirely".  That, to me at least, implies that you were saying that the tropes in question were exclusive to anime.

  • Personally, I like having anime examples separate just because it means I can skip them altogether when reading a trope page. If they were lumped in with the other animated examples, it would be harder to pick out which ones I am and am not interested in without having to read every single one.


    And let us please be honest: Nakama is not renamed because, in the words of Madrugada, every time someone brings it up it causes a "shitstorm", and the mods don't want to deal with it. The "shitstorm" in question being the hail of angry posts from Anime fen who get violently offended at the very idea that Nakama be renamed.
    Agreed. The whole thing slightly reminds me of the "Jonas Quinn" rename back in the day, though (thankfully) Janitor stepped in and renamed that one anyway.
  • I am onboard with renaming Nakama but it is entrenched and popular so I am content to let it sit in it's own corner.
  • Dangerously intelligent creative genius hampered by Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Handle with care.
    ^^ The other two administrators and I talked about that, and I made the point that you've got to do the same thing with Film, Music, Literature, and so on, so why is Animation so different.
  • edited 2011-05-02 14:04:57
    You can change. You can.

    @Juan: When I realized it and stopped complaining, I started my own wiki.  Same problem, different solutions.


    A solution is something that fixes a problem. TVT's bias towards anime is not going to be fixed because you have another wiki...

    As for "originated with Anime", in a lot of cases, the non-Anime animated examples predate the flood of Anime into western culture. Are you saying that the Flintstones, to pick a name out of the air, was influenced by Anime? 

    Maybe the word isn't originated so much as codified. 

    And there are also the ur-examples...


    And you'll excuse me, but you said "different tropes entirely".  That, to me at least, implies that you were saying that the tropes in question were exclusive to anime

    Bad wording and I apologize for it. It's more the fact that they use narrative conventions and traditions that are too different between each other. Not to say that both of them are clearly directed to different markets and their histories are incdredibly divergent.
  • I like turtles.
    See, the thing about Nakama and other names like it is that while I like that we can have names referencing different works, characters, and languages, it seems that the people who actually matter on TV Tropes hate fun things like those.  So I can't understand for the life of me why it hasn't been renamed yet.

    As a site that doesn't want any of those pesky opinions, I find it hard to believe that popular opinion is what's holding them back.

    And to be honest the Grandfather Clause is a horrible excuse.  A policy's being good or bad has nothing to do with its age.

    So why hasn't Nakama been renamed to something nice and bland yet, like "Group of Friends Who Are Like Family"?
  • When in Turkey, ROCK THE FUCK OUT
    Because the Anime fans caused a gigantic shitstorm the last time a rename was proposed.
  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    As a site that doesn't want any of those pesky opinions, I find it hard to believe that popular opinion is what's holding them back.
    Oh, for the millionth time: opinons are allowed. They just don't go on the main page; they go on the reviews.
  • You can change. You can.
    Because, whether you like it or not, the ensuing shitstorm is not worth it.
  • I like turtles.
    ^^Does anyone actually read those?

    I don't.
  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    "I don't feel like looking at the section that solves my biggest problem with the site" hardly seems a valid argument.
  • Let's rephrase the question, then: "Is the review section used to any great extent?"
Sign In or Register to comment.