If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
That we can't have a topic discussing pedoph... lolicon without it getting locked (NSFW)
Comments
The problem is not that it is gross, since few of the pictures were sexualized and blah blah blah. The point is the picspamming itself, because it's force-derailing a thread by shitposting, which is not really an acceptable behaviour in an attempt of a civil forum.
It's absolutely necessary in order to convey your view and win the argument.
Some crew member backstage: They're obviously flirting...
Network Exec: So???
I'm not into loli stuff, but it doesn't really squick me out either.
One thing that really bugs me though, is when people say that liking drawn, Anime-style pictures of younger characters means you want to fuck actual children. It doesn't.
@evilneko: It's still annoying people.
Whatcha think?
Misparsation: I got lolicon porn, bitch.
The FCC is totally fine with this cover because it's True Art and it conveys a meaning that represents the struggle of humanity against the inner Id and the depravity of internet pedophilia.
Da heck did I just read? here I was actually hoping for psychological insight in the minds of people that think people that look like children are sexually appealing.
Can none of these threads ever get anywhere without descending into madness?
>descending into madness
You answered your own question.
I know Insanity Addict, but I can dream for something coherent, can I not?
^^ Also this.
Someone did though, I'm pretty sure.
Also lolno @ Googling Harlequin babies.