If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

That we can't have a topic discussing pedoph... lolicon without it getting locked (NSFW)

1356789

Comments

  • I don't think there is a problem with people who like series ABOUT little girls. I mean, my favourite comic character is Robin so...yeah. But I do think people who want to have SEX with the little girls are peadophiles.
  • In b4 paedophile/ephebophile/paedosexual nitpick.
  • For me, ephebophila is a grey area I mean, age of consent varies all over the world so it's something I'd rather not touch on.

    As for "paedosexual" that's just an excuse for the sick fucks.
  • Arbitrary distinction I've seen it used in:
    pedophile=loves the moe moe feeling, wants to nurture the innocence and that sort of shit
    pedosexual=actually wants to have sex with them, but caters to those needs using lolipr0n/family snapshots/any other material in which no kiddies were harmed in the making of
    child molester=faps to CP for which children were abused/actually molests children
  • edited 2011-06-01 14:00:37
    Has friends besides tanks now
    -looks at locked loli threads-

    -thread hopping mode initiated-

    Hell in a handbasket.

    All this drama. About little girls. It fries mah brain.

    Can we please, please keep the lolis to this thread, if anywhere?

    As a regular, I share the annoyance of the people who don't want thread after thread getting filled with pictures of little anime girls when said pictures are only related in that they're the subject of complaint.

    As a moderator, I find it kinda disrespectful to go into a thread that has a genuine grievance and turn the topic to displaying the subject of that grievance, especially when the topic starter specifically said they didn't want that.

    Also speaking as a moderator, I'd appreciate it if we could be civil in our discourse.
  • edited 2011-06-01 13:54:12
    You can change. You can.
    I thought the place was here.

    This thread is about discussing lolis. Don't see why it should turn to shitposting about lolis. 

    Ninja'd like a motherfucker.
  • How about a compromise? 
    Komoe... from Eiken.  =D

  • edited 2011-06-01 14:00:18
  • Well, the part where she is 12 is disgusting... but otherwise... nothing wrong whatsoever. ^_^

  • This thread is about discussing lolis. Don't see why it should turn to shitposting about lolis.

    Not to mention, we've already had two other threads get locked from this exact same thing. That, and I'm not really happy about my other thread on the subject getting locked.
  • Hey, I'm not the one who wants to diddle chidders.  =p
  • What if I just make all my loli pictures into image macros, which I then spam in unrelated threads like every other image macro ever?
  • edited 2011-06-01 14:40:26
    RE-ANIMATOR
    Unrelated isn't always unjustified.
    Loli generally is unjustified though.
  • Or how about you call cut it out with the creepy fucking lolis?
  • When in Turkey, ROCK THE FUCK OUT
    Agreed. 
  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    'kay, too many posts to thump, so I'm just going to quote the rules real quick:

    4c. If you don't like a thread, and have nothing meaningful to add to it, don't post in it.
  • BobBob
    edited 2011-06-01 14:53:36
    But... I made the thread...

    ;_;
  • Except this thread is about our distaste for Lolis. It would be different if this was a thread about how (for sake of argument) DYRE wasn't able to buy lolicon in shops and we all spammed it with "A MAH GAD WE HATE LOLIS". But this is a thread ABOUT hating Lolicon.
  • edited 2011-06-01 14:57:01
  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    ^^You know, actually, you're right.

    Hmm...I'm wondering if we're just going to have to ban the subject, since nobody on any side is capable of playing nice.
  • Let's not ban the subject.
  • ...I doubt that'll happen...

    ...or that it'd be a good idea...
  • edited 2011-06-01 15:02:54
    Has friends besides tanks now
    ^^^ And let's show that we don't need to ban the subject, not only by playing nice, but also by respecting others' opinions and wishes to not have their threads taken over by the same thing, and a generally unpleasant thing, repeatedly.

    ^^ No.
This discussion has been closed.