If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Comments
Yes.
Because then I see the loophole as:
-Befriend the Legendary
-Designate it as a companion
-After a month together, do negotiations (it doesn't specify a difference with legendaries) for it to allow itself to be captured
Then bam, Legendary on your team. That seems WAY too simple though so I'm wondering what the catch is
EDIT: Sorry if it seems like I'm munchkining, but this just REALLY stood out to me
And even if you did, a Pokemon who deems its' master as being unworthy of it don't have to obey their trainer's orders.
Beyond even that, capturing many legendaries can upset the balance of nature.
It's possible, of course, but for the most part, it's either Master Ball-ing it or having it happen via RP'ing :V
...Although I still don't get why a Frontier Brain is using a Pixie. The Pixies, from what I can tell of game lore, are supposed to be one of a kind
^ What does that mean for rangers though? Are befriend (restrain?) rates and capture rates the same?
Basically I'm wondering if the people who made this game actually left a glaring loophole that makes Rangers able to capture Legendaries FAR easier than expected (because I really hope they didn't as that is just a poor show right there...)
mewtwo doesn't live on the island anymore
Didn't they all disperse to go live with the normal Pokemon at the end or something?
And Mewtwo was chilling in some city or another.
Yeah, it's possible to catch the low-tier ones, like the trio in D/P/P- Uxie, Azelf and that other one. Although even then, it's a really bad idea. High-tier ones, like Dialga and Palkia, are pretty much "Fuck you I'm a dragon" and won't let you touch them unless they want you to or you have an ace in the hole.
It's really hard to capture a Legendary without a Master Ball, though, and those don't grow on
apricorntrees.No.
Honestly, if I ever got a chance to capture a high tier legendary, it would probably be so that I could let it out of the ball right away and then keep the ball with me so only a Snagger could hope to capture it from that point on because messing with things such as Time and Space is... yeah
A few things. Master Balls don't work quite like regular Pokeballs.
Styler to befriend a legendary, then make it a companion, then try to
negotiate it into becoming an owned Pokemon
...Yes it's driving me nuts knowing that there may be a huge loophole there
Ninjad.
EDIT: Ok, now it showed up when it didn't before (I must have been searching for restrained instead of restrain). I see a +25 there so that still makes a legendary capture somewhat less challenging for a Ranger (although since you didn't have +25, I'm guessing that that's either modified rules or else I have an outdated version, in which case woohoo my asking questions doesn't make me look stupid ^o.o^)
Forzare, you're a smart cookie. One of these two options is correct.
:V
EDIT: And sorry for being annoying, Cygan
Helpful title to one Pokemon at a time.
So while it's not impossible, it's certainly very very challenging. And I'd imagine that most legendary Pokemon are pretty easily distracted to do with their respective domains :V
It's cool, I'd rather you ask than run with false assumptions.
Also the Ranger section is horribly written. The text gets cut off both for the part I just quoted and for the information on recharging stylers
Also, I guess I should choose Snow's Ability ^^;
Also, don't forget the fluff about Rangers includes being respectful of Pokemon. I suspect this includes not Companion-izing legendaries.
So I'm betting that a ranger could companionize a legendary and still be respectful, but a good rp'er would keep in mind the circumstances and know whether or not the case is respectful (for example, if a Ranger tried it on, say, a Suicune, but the Suicune wanted to stay there and keep the water clean, then the Ranger would back off)
Gah, trying to find out capabilities and what they do is a headache. Are players not supposed to know what capabilities do? Because I can guess some (e.g. I'm guessing Snow's glow capability means that she glows in the dark), but others not so much (e.g. Icestep is... What? They can walk on ice without sliding?)