If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Images you know you'll never use. (Now NSFW)
Comments
not wake up gay in the morning
half of it serves as lunch
the other half of it serves as dinner
https://i.imgur.com/6dZzlhU.mp4
There's more but life is too short to convert .webp files.
Also, I made these myself;
yes, this is an actual tweet from Greta Thunberg:
why did i think of 14w here
because it seems like it's about two panels away from being one of those creepy gay doujinNgl "progressive feminist enacts viral sexism against guy because he's a political opponent" is one of my favorite genres of hypocrite tweet.
Also I've been super into Andrew Tate lore lately (possibly because everybody is obsessed with talking about him again) so thanks!
Also if he wants to discuss heavy emissions (well, this doesn't sound right) he should just start a Bitcoin farm.
...which I actually wouldn't mind, as I don't really like this sort of thing myself and don't use this line myself either.
Though it is admittedly quite fitting as something that so precisely targets an internet personality whose entire schtick is boasting endlessly about his hypermasculinity. If he's going to be so damned arrogant, then it's a well-deserved comeuppance.
Also, that one four-panel seems like it's meant to criticize the idea of parents forcing gender reassignment surgery on their children, though -- besides not really being funny -- it gets at least two things wrong, both the idea of confusing pretending to be a princess with wanting gender reassignment, and also the whole idea of changing gender in the first place, as trans people I know don't talk about it as a change, but rather as being who they really are. Also, they wouldn't be weirded out by it, unlike Billy in this comic. So this sorta misses the point in multiple ways, from what I understand.
The more a man brags about being a big dick alpha male, the bigger the chance he'll soon be destroyed on twitter by some barely legal girlie with the looks of a Grey hybrid.
We don't actually think the Greta comeback was a massively clever, biting retort and not a schoolyard-level insult, and everybody's only celebrating it because of who it was directed at, right?
The pizza box thing is hilarious tho.
Live by the meme, die by the meme, basically.
Edit: Though the article does note that it's not the only evidence that he's in the country.
So we're still in "it's funny depending on which man" territory. This is Samantha Bee vs. Ivanka Trump all over again.
Moving on!
(Probably need to make it clear that I just found this online and I think it's dumb).
also who's samantha bee
Definitely not about having consistent moral values.
Here.
Anyhow, amusingly, I happen to have a custom-made block on accessing YouTube on my browser, reminding me to use FreeTube instead because it doesn't suggest me related videos (and thus leads me to wasting less time on YouTube), but clicking on that brougnt me to my Leechblock page at which point I was reminded to just check out Samantha Bee on Wikipedia and found the Ivanka Trump controversy easily enough.
It's a little odd for you to be comparing that -- which involves using the word "cunt", a slur specifically regarding women, and on a target not known for excessive femininity in any sense of the word -- as your point of outrage over "consisten[cy in] moral values" in response to Andrew Tate getting owned by a comment telling him that his boasting about how much emissions his cars put out radiates "small dick energy". Inconsistency much?
Also, gentlemen, this is the image thread. Have a frog at the least.
All I'm saying is "It's okay when we do things we don't believe in to our enemies" is not a solid plan.
Presumably, it's the other side that's supposed to have a commitment to those things.
They just conveniently don't have it when it suits them I guess.
Funny how you're making a point of how telling Andrew Tate that he has small dick energy is inconsistent with not being sexist...but Andrew Tate himself being obnoxiously sexist isn't part of your highlights. I guess by your argument he gets off by having sexism as his "consistent" principle so suddenly it's okay? Wouldn't make your position consistent though.
Andrew Tate is a man who seems to do nothing but drive supercars around, fleece sad men out of their money through a "Liminal Order" style program whilst his primary form of finance seems to be running an adult "cam" website (one which is possibly involved in human trafficking). He's virulently anti-family, lacks basic respect for women, and he has a stupidly massive ego and frequently says things like "the cops shouldn't stop me because I'm a millionaire".
He's not a man who has morals in the first place for you to even question.
The point is not stooping to that level. Who cares if you get a "dunk" in on him one time on twitter? Once you've given him the time of day, he's already won.