If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Comments
Then the girl is advocating exercising the women's rights at the expense of the men's, and thus the men should speak against it.
And of course being in the group doesn't mean you know everything. But being well-informed while being still outside the group is like doing a lot of research on Sweden and having talked with a lot of Swedish people, but never actually having been there in your life. You are familiar with what it is like to live in Sweden, but you don't know what it's like to live in Sweden.
Firstly... claiming that sexism is all about the unfair / whatever representation of women is itself a sexist statement. Perhaps the word you were looking for is misogynist... but I dunno.
Honestly.... sexism is just discrimination based on sex (I prefer the word "gender", but that would just rile all the sophists up) ...
And the funny thing is this: men and women are different.
Yeah.
Really.
Men do some things women don't. Women do some things men don't. Men are better at some things than women. Women are better at some things than men.
And here it gets really awkward... Some women are better at things that men are normally better at. Some men are better at things that women are normally better at.
There are TRENDS for either side... but neither is absolute.
But I'd say the very worst aspect of all this anti-sexism nonsense is the bizarre desire to try and make everything completely 50/50 neutral... which is frankly unrealistic.
Well.... that and the polar opposite. The classic stance of promoting the "culture" of every formerly oppressed section of society like it really needs the bells and whistles.
Let stuff happen.
Thas all that is really needed.
Accept men will be men, women will be women, hermaphrodites will be hermaphrodites, futanari will be futanari, asexed will be asexed.... and..... um..... well yeah. Just let stuff play out the way it plays out and don't be so FUCKING STUPID as to get offended because people of a different gender persuasion or whatever perceive / react differently. -_-;
How sexist is this YKKTW, guys?
wicked, y u ninja me so early
The creator can't draw cute girls if his life depended on it, though.
A cleaning maid in a noble's household can be a strong female character, even if she never outwardly rebels and is generally obedient; the most important factor is whether her own feelings, desires and opinions are explored as a human being.
It's all about context.
Schitzo: The fact that the YKTTW uses the popularity of Yanderes among males is telling.
The point of the Bechdel test is to point out how many things FAIL IT
That is not a logical conclusion of "the ones that don't pass are sexist". In any case, the test does not show that a particular work is or isn't sexist, it only exists to highlight the sexism across media in general. That is, if our media were not sexist at all, you certainly wouldn't expect such a large percentage of works to fail the test. Still, a work that does fail the test isn't automatically sexist, and certainly one that passes isn't automatically not.
serve to highlight sexism in media? That is, a work doesn't have to be
sexist to represent sexism as a whole?
Yes. Super Mario Brothers isn't particularly sexist, but you're still a brave strong man saving the helpless girl in pink who can't do shit for herself.
^I'm not sure bringing up the game where Princess Peach has periods to get super powers is all that great a counterpoint.
and I'm speaking about the main game line in any case.
Because the game isn't making any implicit or explicit statement that, say, Mario is saving the princess because he's a man and she's a woman, and such. Having a man save a woman in a story isn't sexist, but when the amount of stories about men saving women outnumbers stories about the inverse a hundred to one, it's a sign of sexism within the culture, even if not necessarily in any particular work.
EDIT: Ninja'd.
It's not about women being hard to write. It's what they're written to be more often than not.
^Like many systemic problems blame isn't the important thing. The important thing is working to change it.