If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

IJBMer Updates

17447457477497501388

Comments

  • MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!

    ^^^So long as it starts with Loeb.


    In any case, one of the things I liked in 3.5 was that one book I forget the title of but was called 'Weeaboo fightan magic' which was basically a bunch of fighter non-caster classes that had Wuxia-style abilities.

  • edited 2012-06-06 18:35:35
    I'm a damn twisted person
    The abilities were encounter based not daily use so it's not quite as annoying as a vancian system.



    Really the magic class I've had a soft spot for was the warlock. The class tells you you have a bunch of at will powers and tells you to go nuts

    Malk - book of nine swords. And as bad as Loeb's stories can be, he isn't a terrible person like a few other writers. Miller, Millar and Ennis spring to mind.
  • MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!

    Yeah, but he's heading the change in cartoons that is resulting in EMH getting cancelled.

  • edited 2012-06-06 18:45:09
    Has friends besides tanks now

    In any case, one of the things I liked in 3.5 was that one book I forget the title of but was called 'Weeaboo fightan magic' which was basically a bunch of fighter non-caster classes that had Wuxia-style abilities.



    That would be Tome of Battle: The Book of Nine Swords, which features the warblade I mentioned earlier (ninja'd). I think that was a step in the right direction.



    The abilities were encounter based not daily use so it's not quite as annoying as a vancian system.



    True. And you could recover them. But I still thought it was silly how they implemented that; rather than letting these classes reuse some maneuvers right away because it's convenient to do so, or using a point-based system that measures fatigue - because it's understandable that certain maneuvers are more taxing than others - it was, in the cases of the more mundane maneuvers, based on the opportunity to make such an attack only presenting itself once every battle, or once every thirty seconds or so, until a pool in the metagame refreshes.



    Really the magic class I've had a soft spot for was the warlock. The class tells you you have a bunch of at will powers and tells you to go nuts



    Yeah. I've always preferred the classes with more spontaneous casting anyway. Well, I can understand the need for At-Will/Encounter/Daily powers, or points to spend, but some abstractions just don't make sense to me when applied to certain types of casters, and in any case they don't have to apply to every casting class.

  • You can change. You can.

    Honestly, what annoys me the most is that I think that this was the only cartoon that has even come close to be on par with the Justice League cartoon, and the only reason it probably won't get to get there is because lolclippedwings

  • MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!

    In any case I think 4e had problems with classes feeling a bit too same-y but it's definitely preferable to Fighter's being worthless after a few levels and casters getting pretty much everything under the sun.


    The Dresden Files I think is another place that has a good handle on magic where different mages have different specialties like Listens-to-wind and healing, Molly and veils, and Dresden's Boomomancy.

  • I'm a damn twisted person
    And finding stuff to move the plot mancy.
  • Has friends besides tanks now

    I've never really felt that 4e was too same-y, either, honestly. But that's probably a matter of preference/perspective and I don't think it merits its own discussion.

  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    I haven't actually played 4E, but it's one of the common complaints, which therefore has a lot to do with the design goals for 5E.

  • edited 2012-06-06 19:02:10
    It really should be called "Boomurgy". "-mancy" means "to see", whereas "-urgy" means "to work."



    Alkthash: fine I'll give you that fantasy race thing but dwarfs are awesomesauce so shut up
  • Has friends besides tanks now

    I haven't actually played 4E



    Well, if the playtest doesn't get enough people, I might try to get some people together for a game that's actually about as complete as it gets.

  • They're somethin' else.

    EEEE DEEE SEEE TIME NIGGA!!

  • I'm a damn twisted person
    I'm sorry sir we don't speak meme. English if you please good sir?
  • He who laments and can't let go of the past is forever doomed to solitude.

    About the playtest discussion, I don't find the balance issue to be that grave, because even if what's said about greek heroes is true, the support characters mages and evil mages were actually more powerful than the hero, they usually lacked the luck or tenacity of the hero, not his ability to kill shit.

  • MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!

    Yeah, but if people play a swordsmaster it's hard to feel like the awesome hero when the wizard has already mopped the floor six way to sunday.

  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    Greek myths aren't games.
  • edited 2012-06-06 20:52:40
    Has friends besides tanks now

    ^^^ The point is that the fighters ought to be just as capable of legendary feats as the wizards so that players feel equally as useful and no one has a significantly greater amount of fun than any of the others. If it's a matter of him winning because he's lucky, then maybe the fighter could get a luck bonus X times per day. But saying "even then, wizards were stronger" doesn't actually do anything to balance the game, and let's face it, 3e is ridiculously unbalanced. I'd hate to see another entire edition of improper balance.

  • He who laments and can't let go of the past is forever doomed to solitude.

    I find game balance second to consistency but I do agree balance is needed to prevent broken parties.

  • edited 2012-06-06 20:54:40
    OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    The main problem is that the game makes you choose between a magic character and a useless character. There has to be a way to avoid that and keep thematic consistency.
  • Has friends besides tanks now

    ^^ I can't back consistency, in this case, because it's a fantasy game anyway, and in any case, how many historical wizards are capable of doing literally everything imaginable and ascending to omnipotence like 3.5e wizards and clerics? Whereas party balance is crucial to enjoyment of the game flat-out.

  • MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!

    (sigh) so I ended up deciding to unfollow a friend on tumblr. I really didn't want to do it, but things were getting harder and harder to deal with, what with her telling people she didn't like to kill themselves (something that reminds me of some rather unpleasant times in high school) and then lecturing on the potential of triggering someone. 


    The final straw basically came to her insisting our friendship hinge on agreeing with her on an issue and... well that was that.

  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    Wow, that's...well, that's definitely a thing that happened.
  • edited 2012-06-06 21:45:17
    If that don't work, use more gun.

    Oh wow.  That's pretty terrible.  I'm really sorry to hear that.


    Huh.  Got put on a 3 day ban on TVT.  Whatever.


    Playing P3P some more.  Man, I love the Gold Shadow Floors.  So much money to be had.

  • You can change. You can.

    Malk: Hrrn. I feel ya, to say the least. I do hope you still remain as friends, though.

  • Till shade is gone, till water is gone, into the Shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath, to spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the last Day.
    Sorry to hear that, Malk.
  • Has friends besides tanks now

    Eesh. That sucks, bro.

  • MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!

    ^^^I hope so too, but I'm not the one who gave the ultimatum. I imagine it was mostly posturing, but still...

  • You can change. You can.

    She often does that, actually. I'm checking her blog and I don't see any actual ultimatum, though (I do see a somewhat OTT comment, tho'). Was this in private?

  • MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!

    Basically one of the tags (she might have removed it) was 'if you don't say yes we can't be friends'.

  • edited 2012-06-06 22:05:45
    smote
    It was a public comment. And a public ninja.



    All this tabletop talk has reminded me of the 4e games I wanted to run--a one-shot and a Spelljammer game. It looks like my creativity will be channeled towards shipping this summer though.
Sign In or Register to comment.