If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Banksy Shouldn't Be Punished Because It's Art
Erm, what? I've heard this statement a whole bunch of times and it doesn't sit right with me. Banksy defaces people's property, there is no reason what soever that he can't do his paintings on canvasses LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. Or Hell, do them on his own damn wall.
I mean, if I killed a bunch of children, ripped all their bones out and used them to make sculptures, then I would rightly imprisoned, no? Well not if I call it art!
Comments
One assumes you're not the shopkeeper or building owner having to remove ugly images that would look just as "good" on paper as brick, then.
It's fucking vandalism, and should be done on your own property, not somebody else's. If I'm sitting on a train reading a paper, you don't have the right to reach underneath me and start drawning on the other side of it. I'm quite sure there's a similar, better analogy I can make based on the same idea.
[Comment deleted]
[Reason: Shitpost, Inappropriate image (?)]
People are free to paint whatever they want on their own walls or if they have an owner's permission.
Even though this one would pay to see that:
Otherwise it's no different from claiming theft to be art if you do an interpretive dance to get past security.
I remember there was some funny graffiti near here. Somebody painted a carousel onto a traffic roundabout just down the road from here. Then the council painted over it because they are boring sods.
I have to say I really don't see why people care. It's not like brick looks so amazing.