Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Comments
You are a Social Democrat. 12 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 80 percent are more extremist than you.
Suffice to say any other decade I'd be about 30% further right on the communist/capitalist bit, but there was a bit of topical bias in the realm of "why we can't have nice things" as it directly relates to my age group personally getting screwed.
You are a Social Democrat. 12 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 89 percent are more extremist than you.
I still think these suffer from having loaded questions. But given only 12 percent went my way, it might just be me.
That's mostly a result of having a bazillion categories. Their algorithm appears to class you as social democrat if you skew left on economy, slightly left on everything above it, and aren't too ludicrously far in either direction on the last two.
From what I can tell, the categories on this thread account for just under half their sample space, and they're mostly identical kinds of liberal in everything but scale.
You are a cosmopolitan Social Democrat. 15 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 67 percent are more extremist than you.
All Nines, ClockworkUniverse and Icalasari are now officially my homies.
But you know what, this test kinda shows why I don't think of myself as right-winger. I'm just righty in comparison. That said, I'm using the phrase here as it is usually understood, as in personal definitions anything can happen.
that has more to do with the fact that a lot of the ecological questions involve thinking that verges into "Would you starve in order to save the animals" territory than our actual positions, in my opinion.
Well, here's the problem with the "ecological" thing being based in dichotomies like that.
What if I don't believe that those dichotomies exist, unless you completely suck at making policy decisions? Granted, most people do suck at making policy decisions...
Dear gods and grebes, had I weighted any of my questions, I probably would have read as an anarcho-communist or something...
I'm not sure if I would mind that, to be honest. I like Kropotkin.
i r extremist
You're pretty extreme, Nova.
i r extremiest lol
extremists unite
the internationale unites the human race
i read that as:
the intersectionale unions the human race
Long Version:
You are a social democratic Cosmopolitan. 12 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 95 percent are more extremist than you.
Short Version:
You are a Neo-Conservative. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 91 percent are more extremist than you.
I do not really understand what this stuff means, but whatever.
It probably means a lot less because trying to compress a huge number of issues with various nuances into a single set of labels necessarily loses some data.