If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
I wonder if anybody here could beat Alex in a sword fight?
Comments
I'd beat him the pirate way.
Sheer force of numbers.
From what I've heard about combat, and I think he'd agree with this, extensive training and knowledge isn't a guarantee of victory over a less skilled opponent. People make mistakes and get lucky. It'd be less likely, but I think it's not impossible for one of us to beat him in mortal combat.
I'd just shoot him after I'd draw my sword because why not
Obligatory Indiana Jones reference.
If he's a thinking human being, the answer is "lolno"
For example, you can use a knife to stab the guy to death once they start laughing at your gunsword
lol
^^That reminds me with a conversation my dad had with the owner of a gun store, regarding pink guns. The owner had this to say about them: "I actually prefer them. I figure if I ever need to point it at someone, they'll laugh, and while they're doing that, I'll shoot."
hellokittyassaultrifle.jpg
It is the Gun, silly.
This is certainly a thing. Plus, numbers overwhelm -- if all of you decided to fight me at once, I'd have to play with terrain and find ways to harm your morale to have any hope of winning. There's no way I can take the twenty-whateverish regulars of IJBM head-on atop flat, even terrain. Twenty dudes (and dudettes), man. That would be a battle worthy of song and all, but it's kind of impossible.
As for gunblades and stuff, I remember thinking of one way it could work -- the magazine sits along the riccasso of the blade, with the crossguard being the barrel. This would be excellent for binds, because you could lock an adversary's weapon in place with yours and then shoot freely.
So it would work well with a sword-breaker sort of weapon? Especially a shorter one, like a parrying dagger.
^^ Well, since the gun is on the crossguard, it doesn't need a sword-breaker accompaniment. Your gunshots are attacks of opportunity whenever that presents itself. I mean, if you were to capture an enemy's weapon in an off-hand weapon and then shoot them, there's no real point in having a gunsword -- may as well have a gun.
^ With bloodshed, I'd expect. If I had to fight a group, I'd make certain to find some narrow ground where I can't get overwhelmed. Then I'm free to fight small numbers while the rest of you watch and listen.
I'd probably let him kill some of you because why not.
Then I'd shoot him, give him a high five as a way of saying thank you. Because, you know, we'd still be best bros.
Depends on where you shoot him.
I'm sure he wouldn't mind being a eunuch for the rest of his life.
^ SHOOTER NO SHOOTING
I don't know, if you shot him in his high-fiving hand he might not be able to high-five you properly.
Or if you shot him in the head he might not be able to live properly.
That assumes I wouldn't be a dick and aim for the...you know, dick.
True, that is more likely. But in the unlikely event you actually manage to hit him, I doubt even Alex's sheer GAR would be able to ignore the fact that he just got shot in the gentleman's region. I doubt he'd be in a position to high-five you for several hours at least.
Yeah Juan you would probably not be getting high fives forever if you shot me in the dick. Jus' saiyan.
dickgirls, all of you.