If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Karma meters on message boards
They unnerve me a bit. Why have them?
(I have a feeling I'll be getting responses as to why to have them, but I don't feel like listing them right now, so I'll respond to what comes up)
Comments
personally, I think they're only really useful on tech-support forums, or things where reliable testimony is paramount.
^ That seems less like it could be manipulated, but still kinda redundant if post count is being used. You don't get a lot of posts in a good community by being a prick.
My posting style would be Renegade.
*tumbleweeds, rimshots and crickets chirping, oh my!*
Post counts, karma and upvotes are just ways to attract megalomaniacs and assholes who'll turn any discussion into a circle jerk.
Hell, I'm a little against the concept of profiles at all, because establishing a persona that can accumulate fame or prestige is a great way of turning people into dribbling morons.
>Flame war or argument is won.
>Notice that the winner only has Karma in the single digits
>Instant Ban
"personally, I think they're only really useful on tech-support forums, or things where reliable testimony is paramount."
That's the idea in theory; to see whose advice is most helpful. In practice, it ends up leading to vote wars such as downvoting everyone a person disagrees with and then claiming that their low karma meant they don't deserve to be listened to. I remember on another forum that people constantly complained that they wanted the karma system dropped due to the sheer amount of abuse.
On one forum I go to, they used to have a karma system
If one's karma was too low, they were insta banned
There were people with tons of karma
The more karma you had, the more points you could give or remove from someone
Kind of obvious why it was eventually removed
Fucking Reddit
I am not sure if this counts as a karma meter, but I think it can be somewhat useful if something like it is a way for mods/admins to encourage good behavior and discourage rule-breaking. I know of one forum that uses a meters like that, giving and taking away points based on a user's behavior. Everyone started at around 50% and people who dropped down to 0% were banned while those who reached 100% were given special icons by their names and some other random privileges.
From what I could tell, the effect of the meters was generally that people tended to do some good stuff to help out mods (e.g., greeting new members, answering FAQs, and reporting rule-breaking), but the forum could be rather competitive at times and the meters sometimes encouraged elitism and such.
Personally, I am not a fan of post counts, karma meters, MOFWs, fancy pants user titles/icons because I think they can encourage newbie bullying, cliquey junk, and otherwise promote hierarchies between users. I understand that some people like them though and whether or not a site has them is probably not a big deal in the scheme of things.
"Post counts, karma and upvotes are just ways to attract megalomaniacs and assholes who'll turn any discussion into a circle jerk."
I gave someone negative karma on a forum once because they changed their username to something I thought sounded dumb. They got mad at me.
That's really the only experience I've ever had with karma systems.
You can tell who gives karma?
On that forum, yeah. I don't know how common that is though since I don't think I've ever been active on any other forum with a karma system.
I quite like them, when they're entirely post-by-post, being able to downgrade or upgrade posts is a good way to show approval or disapproval without having to post "This" or "wut".
I wouldn't mind if karma was by post; it could show that someone has a disagreeable opinion that has no effect on other opinions that they have; in other words, show that they've made mistakes, but are perhaps not entirely bad of character, because if they are, they could just be banned anyway.
I still maintain these things are goddamn dumb
With that said, caring about them is worse.