If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Sometimes, I wonder if when people go on about some ideal person to project positive qualities onto, do they consider aspiring to be that person themselves? Even if it's just aesthetics, would they put effort into improving their own appearance?
Comments
The vital component of a soulmate fantasy is "accepts me as am I, meaning I don't have to work on myself".
I promptly realized that I was attracted to people who did not follow that list in multiple ways, which meant that the list was a load of bull anyway.
A kind person whom I care for
Why can't people have it that simple?
This is problematic to say the least.
"Maybe the people for whom that's true don't bother mentioning it because it's something they understand to be taken for granted."
Why? Unless it's the stalkerish version, it shows that you are not just thinking of yourself.
"Really, I don't want someone who 'accepts me as I am' I want someone who inspires me to be a better person.
Though that might be another form of idealization..."
It is. Whether either is good or bad depends on whether you'd do the same to your significant other.
The point I was trying to make with that is essentially a rewording of what other people have been saying: There are so many possibilities and you could fall in love with just about any set of traits, so a complex list is completely pointless
Some people are incredibly fussy about their criteria for "The One". Oh, to hell with it, I'll say it straight - some women have lists o expectations you wouldn't believe.
I'll never forget one woman whose details I got when I was with a dating agency. I spoke to her over the phone and she asked me how tall I was. I said 5''9. She sounded really disappointed. I mean, I'd have understood it (up to a point) if I'd have said "Actually, I suffer from dwarfism and I'm three-and-a-half feet tall." But she must have been only prepared to go for 6 feet and over or something, as if that was relevant to anything.
By "work on myself", do we mean "start showering more" change or "start not liking Star Trek" change? Because one of those is more agreeable than the other.
^ I think the phrase is "You complete me."
The use of the word "mate" makes me think of a bunch of British or (even more) Aussie guys describing their ideal male friend, which is quite amusing.
>Start not liking Star Trek
Like I'd envision it: you shower twice a day if you have a party in the eve, you don't shower if you're going to work up a sweat anyway. You make stabs at Trekkies when with your drinking buds, you discuss Star Trek fanfics on a forum. You just become socially adaptable, accomadating your partner in a reasonable measure without her dictating how you should behave 24/7.
insert outie A into innie B?
It was just her poking fun at how I was acting at one point, but I'm still not sure if I should take that as a compliment or insult