If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Comments
Expecting them to conform to them as archetypes would be stupid, of course, but that's not the same thing.
I'm not saying it's impossible to self-describe using tropes, but it is really difficult because they're based on larger-than-life characters and situations. Not many of us are larger than life.
Actually, I also agree having other people apply them to each others pages is possibly even worse because it favours the forum superstars and other people who tend to attract either flattery or hatred. I would say - put something else on your trope page. Say what works you like, say what you do, say what your favourite pizza topping is. Just don't claim to be a bloody Deadpan Snarker.
Example: Deadpan Snarker, a perennial favorite of many comes with the implication that the person is funny due to association via trope pages. Whereas sarcastic only denotes a type of humor because...it's only that.
A least, that's my take on it.
The problem with this sort of behaviour is that it makes life into a simplified narrative, a miniature version of Hegelian idealism. And before you know it, bang, Baudrillard.
In all seriousness, there's indeed a wide gap between pimping your troper page and believing your life plays out like a movie narrative. A lot of it probably comes from bad experience with some former pimp-happy tropers(DarkLadyCelebrian springs to mind).
Nevertheless, there are a few I should probably trim. I haven't actually bothered to look at the list in quite a while, and a lot of it dates to when I was stupider.
(I think the line is beautiful friendship, but, nitpicking.)