If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

Things you like but "shouldn't"

2

Comments

  • You can change. You can.
    Yes, I'm aware. But I find the subject fascinating and I'd like to hear why these moral values, social pressures and cultural expectations affect th way you think you should think of this things. In your own words. And not based on the usual psycho babble of "Lolol we're social animals"
  • edited 2011-08-29 22:53:49

    The only thing I feel guilty about liking is The Irate Gamer, and only because there's no such thing as bad publicity where YouTube views are concerned. Maybe stuff like Civilization for being too good (that once I start, I can't tear myself away from it).

    Otherwise, I can perceive whether something aligns with my preference fine on my own. Though there are a few cases where bad word-of-mouth will lead me to re-examine something I otherwise like. The most prominent example I can think of is doing an entire liveblog of the Cardcaptors dub partially motivated by the cognitive dissonance of the TvTropes page claiming it to be utter shit and my personal fond memories of it.

  • @Juan, you toss around phrases like "I like it, It's irrational that I like it"

    And you're the one expecting intelligence?

    That's completely the opposite.
  • You can change. You can.
    Notice that none of my posts have mentioned the word "irrational"
  • Okay, I'm done.
  • edited 2011-08-29 22:58:41
    MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!
    Well, for example, as a lefty socialist hippie pinko, for example, it often becomes rather uncomfortable to see misogyny or racism in a work. Also there are social expectations and judgments that will impose themselves on you from years of implication and association. Even if you're never told 'guys don't like the english patient' it's still something that's been drilled in subtly over the years, which can end up with those feelings after liking The English Patient.

    Gah. Ninjaing and personal attacks. Oi.
  • edited 2011-08-29 23:02:30
    You can change. You can.
    And now I wanna read Problem Sleuth even though it's unfunny crap. 

    ^ Ah, OK.

    How do you feel about Birth of a Nation?
  • edited 2011-08-29 23:04:17

    "Well, for example, as a lefty socialist hippie pinko, for example, it often becomes rather uncomfortable to see misogyny or racism in a work."

    In that case, I evaluate whether the rest of the story is good enough to outweigh the magnitude of the prejudice. Besides, there's a hell of a lot of stuff getting ruled out if misogyny is a breaking factor (though admittedly my criteria in this case is anything where the woman is treated as an object for the male hero more than a character).

  • edited 2011-08-29 23:04:53
    MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!
    Honestly, I'm more frustrated at my Smallville addiction since I didn't even enjoy the show and just kept watching out of habit and compulsion.

    ^Oh, I do that. I can usually work past it but it is initially uncomfortable.
  • I'LL STAY MAI HAUNDS...WITH YAU BLAHT
    Even though the later seasons are supposed to be terrible and it has 2.5 stars on Netflix, I love King of the Hill.
  • I like it, even though I don't watch it that often.
  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    I just mainly like shows that aren't all that good, like Harry Potter, Nanoha and Soul Eater, so I can't figure out why I like them over shows people say are better like Monster, Evangelion and books like Lolita and Tom Sawyer.
  • You can change. You can.
    I feel that I should mention that Monster, Evangelion, Lolita and Tom Sawyer do have some flaws. Welp, I can't talk about Lolita and Tom Sawyer. 

    also, to be fair, it's not like you'd be interested in grimdark stories (Or stories with so much cynicism as Evangelion and Monster possess)
  • MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!
    I'd actually argue that in spite of how dark it is, Monster is pretty optimistic about human nature.
  • You can change. You can.
    Same goes to Evangelion, but they are still pretty dark shows. --shrug--

    I probably shouldn't have used the word cynicism.
  • "And now I wanna read Problem Sleuth even though it's unfunny crap."

    Nigga what.
  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    I feel that I should mention that Monster, Evangelion, Lolita and Tom Sawyer do have some flaws. Welp, I can't talk about Lolita and Tom Sawyer. 

    also, to be fair, it's not like you'd be interested in grimdark stories (Or stories with so much cynicism as Evangelion and Monster possess)

    I just don't like the darkness of the first two, and the writing style of the second two put me off.
  • MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!
    I remember liking Lolita when I was a teen because of english-russian wordplay in the book.
  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    I don't care much for wordplay. And thus my dislike for punnery.
  • You can change. You can.
    @Cygan: Pretty much what I meant. There's nothing wrong with not liking critically appraised works if their style and characteristics don't appeal to you.

    Nigga what.

    Oh, I went there, bitch. I went there and set a flag. 
  • MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!
    ^^ Yeah, but as a teen who spoke Russian it felt awesome to have these puns I understood that so many others didn't.

    It made me feel special. ^_^
  • edited 2011-08-30 00:42:34
    If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    Pretty much what I meant. There's nothing wrong with not liking critically appraised works if their style and characteristics don't appeal to you.

    Yeah. But then I do watch shows that people say are OK but not deep or anything, so it feels like I'm just kind of dumb for not getting the more intelligent shows.

    Which is fair enough, I guess. I mean, when the shows I watch are kind of dumb and the intellectual shows don't appeal to me, I guess I can see how that would make me dumb.
  • You can change. You can.
    That'd be logical if you didn't like said shows because they have an intellectual slant/appeal.
  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    I do not think I could ever dislike a show because of how smart it is. I could just not get it, though, which does make me dumb, doesn't it? Fairly sure not getting smart stuff makes you dumb.
  • "Oh, I went there, bitch. I went there and set a flag."

    I'll cut you up, son.
  • edited 2011-08-30 00:50:54
    You can change. You can.
    --shrug--

    Way I see it, if you understand the point of the story and it doesn't appeal to you, then you're entitled to not like it. 

    ^COME AT ME, BRO
  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    I guess so.
  • LaiLai
    edited 2011-08-30 21:52:16
    I say my dilemma is that I like X, but doing so promotes practice of Y, therefore encouraging Z to continue doing Y and therefore I should logically hate Z.

    Feel free to interpret this as you wish.
Sign In or Register to comment.