If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Since I've heard so many complaints about things I like I figured I'd return the favor.
I got to be honest I don't understand the appeal of these things. The one nice thing I can say about them is that the artists are pretty good at what they do (or at least they were--I can't stand the more modern artstyles) but I can't justify buying a graphic novel just for good drawings. That's one of my first biggest complaints: these things are so overpriced. You can literally expect to pay $15 for 100-150 pages (literally a dollar a page) for say one Marvel Masterwork. Of course you could get the Essentials instead but then you're getting them without color, which is a little like buying a dub-only anime DVD if you ask me.
Some people have told me "the quality justifies the price" which... no, it really doesn't. Superhero stories are kind of lame, and a lot of times you can tell the writer had only one month to pen a narrative and like television, often they're penned around whatever will attract the most attention rather than actually being a story worth telling ("in this issue, one of the X-Men dies!"... and then its an X-Man nobody cares about anyway). This is before you even get into issues like retcons, characters who die and constantly come back to life, villains who are never stopped for good, the exact same social issues coming up over and over with no sense of progress or closure, or how the universes get more and more convoluted the further in they go. Never mind that by this point, all the characters you gave a damn about have either been flanderized to hell or else had their personalities canon-raped so they would appeal to the "edgy" demographic. That's my biggest issue right there (and I feel like I'm being redundant for some reason): nothing in comics is about art, its all focus-tested to appeal to trends and demographics. Sort of like moeblob anime.
Granted, I still like the early Marvel and a few sundry others, but there is often a feeling that "they're good in spite of their flaws." And on some of my worst days (days where I don't have any painkillers especially) I simply can't look past them. It's hard to enjoy an early Juggernaut story with the foreknowledge that, in later years, they have Juggernaut trying to help the survivors of 9-11 (such a crass marketing stunt that I'm surprised Marvel didn't face public backlash over that).
Anyway, I'm gonna go play some video games now. Peace!
Comments
Well, he is. But that's not all he is, and it's not all he does.
An issue I have with superhero comics is the floating timeline. By now, Marvel and DC have created a unique worlds that don't need to piggyback off of reality to create a setting. So why the hell do they the current issues always need to be today. It causes a lot of problems in terms of dates of past events and origins. One good example of this is a more recent addition to the Marvel universe. Runaways is a series that started in the early to mid-2000s and is about teenagers you fight our their parents are supervillains and in turn discover their own abilities and run away in order to survive and defeat their parents. Most of the characters at that time are established to have been born in the 1980s. This is in fact is a major plot point. However, given the floating timeline of Marvel and in 2009 when the third volume of the comic had ended. They were still teenagers and haven't really aged more than a year, but since at that point it was 2009 their individual birthyears had then changed with the constantly updating setting but slower paced storyline. So now the Runaways had to be born in the 1990s. Even the oldest among them at age 18 would have been born in 1991 in a 2009 setting.
The problem with a floating timeline gets even worse with characters who have been around for more than 60 years and aren't even over 40 years old in the comic book. The floating timeline is also a part of the reason DC needs a universe reboot about every 10 to 20 years now.
Exactly! Remember how DC comics once stood for Detective Comics?
^^^^Well, they don't. I'm not saying that they need to completely change the setting, but it is silly to still being using the Now setting. When you make a major supervillain the president of the United States then you have places to go with that and you've pretty much departed from the Now setting completely. Keeping up on current world events has little do to with the superhero comicbook world. It just pretty much changes Iron Man's origin story after ever new war. Sure, 9/11 had a huge effect on everything even the comicbook worlds, but does it really matter who the president in the real world is? Does the real-world economy, religions, and current events really change anything in the the comicbook worlds? No, the writers have their own plans in place for those worlds and they have their own world changing events (that usually get retconned anyway). If anyway, current events are just background at best.
I like the Hulk, but honestly I think the Kenneth Johnson TV series is an improvement over the comic in just about every way.
In fact, it reminds me of something else that bothers me. That series, as well as the very earliest Superman comics, were basically about "what would happen if this one extraordinary guy existed in the everyday world." That was part of what made those versions interesting, and I feel like making superheroes a "universe" dilutes that somewhat. Then again, I kind of dislike "universes" on principle--I'd rather each character be separate and unrelated.