›
If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

"The world would be better off without men"

2»

Comments

  • HatterHatter
    Glaives are better.
    Allecto comes to mind. Biting Beaver seems to have a similar opinion, although she'd rather men be psychologically (if not physically) castrated, so I suppose she's more tolerant in comparison. One person on the TV Tropes forum went on a long rant about how he (I think it was a he) would create a virus that would sterilize men and make women be only able to bear female children. Coincidentally, my complaining about his deranged fantasies of gendercide got me banned.
  • SammySammy
    "One person on the TV Tropes forum went on a long rant about how he (I
    think it was a he) would create a virus that would sterilize men and
    make women be only able to bear female children."

    Was it Deboss? It sounds like Deboss.
  • NoimportaNoimporta
    Allecto comes to mind. Biting Beaver seems to have a similar opinion

    Allecto? Biting Beaver? Who are they? Their names don't sound very Real Lifeish.
  • HatterHatter
    edited 2011-05-13 23:11:09
    Glaives are better.
    I think it was "Bio Electric Clam" or something. It was a while ago.

    Noimporta, Allecto and Biting Beaver are feminazi bloggers. The former is best known for accusing Joss Whedon of being a rapist because women had fewer spoken words than men in the pilot episode of Firefly. The latter is best known for psychologically terrorizing her son, indoctrinating him to believe that male sexual urges were immoral, and expressing the wish that she'd aborted him.
  • NoimportaNoimporta
    So what you're saying is that they are, in fact, random extremists in the internet?
  • HatterHatter
    Glaives are better.
    I never said they were common. It takes a special, rare kind of insanity to think that people should be killed simply because of what's between their legs.
  • ninjaclownninjaclown
    edited 2011-05-13 23:32:07
    I don't usually ask these kinds of giant, metaphorical questions, but if they became possible through artificial conception or whatever: How would you imagine men only worlds would be like, and women only worlds would be like?
  • HatterHatter
    Glaives are better.
    Men only worlds might be cool, if super dooper stick-it-in-the-pooper gay. Like 300, except without Sarah Conner/Queen Cersei's tits. Women only worlds would be worse, though. With no men to fight for them, women would go insane with rage and butcher each other in droves. Did you know that women have kill-counters set in their irises? The only reason why women resort to trickery and sly comments is that their kill counter goes up by two for every soul they kill.
  • inkblotinkblot
    000
    What worries me is that if people find a way to reproduce without sperm or egg cells, the entire human race is going to think that they don't need the opposite sex.
  • PonicalicaPonicalica
    (void)
    «Did you know that women have kill-counters set in their irises?»
    I think you're getting «women» confused for «Annihilator Iosa».
  • HatterHatter
    Glaives are better.
    Well, they're closely related.
  • PonicalicaPonicalica
    (void)
    *tilts head to side*
  • HatterHatter
    Glaives are better.
    Women. And Terminators. Also, Khornate Berzerkers. They're all soulless monsters that somehow manage to simultaneously arouse my fear just as they arouse my penis.
Sign In or Register to comment.