If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

If America implemented the "Frugal Crime Execution" Attitude...

edited 2011-05-08 17:47:26 in Philosophy
☭Unstoppable Sex Goddess☭
like the ones most of the wanna-be heroes/paladins/edgy teenagers that you hear from on a regular basis talk about, how would America change for the better? What good can come from "purging the filth from the world" or "incinerating the garbage"?

Apparently these people completely trust Law Enforcement and the Government to execute the right people?

What good would come out of executing millions of criminals and people in jail, and making that the standard for punishment?
«1

Comments

  • BECUZ IT'S PURGING THE KILLURZ AND RAPYSTS AND DRUGGEEZ AND JWALKERS AND IT LETS ME ADVOCATE MURDER WHILE NOT LOOKING LIKE A PSYCHOPATH AND IT'S GOOD SO SHUT UP BEFORE I HAVE YOU ARRESTED AND GIVEN THE DEATH PENALTY YOU FUCKER!11
  • Till shade is gone, till water is gone, into the Shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath, to spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the last Day.
    Just to clarify, we're talking about the Light Yagami approach to crimefighting right now, right?
  • relevant: George Bernard Shaw on Fabian socialism and the death penalty.

  • Is this even worth discussing at all? I mean, I have never seen anyone who wasn't an idiot seriously advocate this.
  • Well we did have a discussion about birthers earlier.
  • edited 2011-05-08 19:26:01
    Loser
    Vorpy,

    What good can come from "purging the filth from the world" or "incinerating the garbage"?

    Apparently these people completely trust Law Enforcement and the Government to execute the right people?

    What good would come out of executing millions of criminals and people in jail, and making that the standard for punishment?


    My guess would be little to no good. I agree that giving the government that much power could lead to pretty bad things (like detaining or executing political prisoners or just harming those one does not like such as those who have unpopular religions or habits). If you believe Death Note then I suppose one of those harms would be that the people in charge would start executing lazy people too.

    I am not totally sure about this, but I think that part of this mentality comes from an extension of the "good guys vs. bad guys" approach to society. If you think that "bad guys" are just bad period and are thus irredeemable, I can see how you could mentally justify such an approach even if I still disagree with it.

    I believe the reality of the situation is that it is generally possible to have some degree of rehabilitation and even if that is seemingly impossible for certain people, I think that human rights concerns should make people extra cautious about using the death penalty in such a way anyway. 
  • "My guess would be little to no good."

    Except you're still giving it.
  • It would deter people from committing crimes. If that was all that mattered, it would be a great idea.
  • When in Turkey, ROCK THE FUCK OUT
    Just like the death penalty, amirite
  • I'm suspicious of any philosophy that divides people into good people and bad people.
  • Glaives are better.
    Some people deserve to be executed. Murderers, mostly. And if someone gets convicted of a serious crime (like armed robbery or arson) multiple times, I don't think it's fair to society to give them free food and lodging for the rest of their lives. Exile or enslavement wouldn't be overkill, I think.

    Still, though, I don't think it's the punishment that needs to be ramped up; it's the certainty of punishment that needs to be made clear. I think that anyone getting convicted of a crime should be sentenced publicly, so that everyone can see their shame. That would be a better deterrence against crime than harsher sentences, I think.
  • I don't see any good from it I suggest we remember the citizens arrest. return power to the people. It's not the abu se of pwoer but the power to abuse.
  • edited 2011-05-08 20:59:43
    Loser
    Bob,

    Except you're still giving it.


    Sorry, but for some reason I cannot quite understand what you mean by that. What is the "it" to which you are referring?

    Hatter,

    Some people deserve to be executed. Murderers, mostly. And if someone
    gets convicted of a serious crime (like armed robbery or arson) multiple
    times, I don't think it's fair to society to give them free food and
    lodging for the rest of their lives. Exile or enslavement wouldn't be
    overkill, I think.


    I can probably get what you mean when you talk about free food and lodging, but I wonder how exile would even work. How would you make sure they were isolated enough from society to not harm people? Even if that is more of a theoretical idea, it seems more like dumping off a problem on someone else than fixing it to me.

    As for enslavement, I am not really sure how that is proportional punishment or whatever, but I would like to hear how you could justify that as not being overkill given most countries' views on slavery these days. Slavery does seem like overkill to me personally, if only because I think that enslavement is disgusting and not something worthy of a human being. I also doubt that someone who fails to rehabilitate in prison would be able to behave as a slave, but I would never really want that to happen anyway.

    I am more curious than anything about your idea of justice here. I hope I did not sound too harsh earlier.

    You may have a point about certainty of punishment. I guess enforcement would still be a factor though. I doubt having public sentencing would do much good if many of the people who committed a crime still got away with it. Then again, I would guess that you probably support better enforcement too and I agree that harsher sentences may not necessarily be the answer here.
  • I think whether someone "deserves" to die is unimportant compared to what the costs and benefits are of having the person killed.
  • The "it" is your opinion. It's great that you want to give your two cents on the matter, but it's really not necessary to put a disclaimer on it.

    In other words, please cut it out. Do it for the children.
  • I frankly don'5tr agree with three strikes or death penalty anyway I favor rehabilitation and recompense to punishment.
  • Ah, I see.

    He was saying his guess was that the answer to the question would be little to no good, not that the guess he was making was little to no good.
  • The
    "it" is your opinion. It's great that you want to give your two cents
    on the matter, but it's really not necessary to put a disclaimer on it.
    l2read
  • Okay, what am I missing here?
  • edited 2011-05-08 21:04:06
    Pony Sleuth
    Hey, both of those meanings were acceptable interpretations.

    ^Okay, give me a sec to spell it out.
  • edited 2011-05-08 21:07:20
    Pony Sleuth
    What good can come from "purging the filth from the world" or "incinerating the garbage"?

    Apparently these people completely trust Law Enforcement and the Government to execute the right people?

    What good would come out of executing millions of criminals and people in jail, and making that the standard for punishment?


    "My guess would be little to no good."

    Louie was saying that little to no good would come from these executions.

    It's like you ask me if I want cake or pie, and I say that my answer is pie. I'm not saying that I have a pie made from answers.
  • BobBob
    edited 2011-05-08 21:07:28
    ?

    That has nothing to do with what I posted. I'm saying that Louie always posting stuff like "My guess would be little to no good" and the like before putting his/her opinion is annoying.
  • edited 2011-05-08 21:10:21
    Pony Sleuth
    Yes it does. You were reading something into his post that he didn't intend.

    Okay, let's try another example.

    "Do you think today's weather will be good or bad?"

    "My guess is... bad."
  • Not sure how, but if I am, I'm sorry.

    Louie, my apologies.


  • my views are stated pretty well at about 4:16
  • ☭Unstoppable Sex Goddess☭
    The whole No Cruel and Unusual Punishment seems to stand in the way to any major changes to the way we punish people for some reason.

    While I generally do not approve of malicious saw-like torture or anything that dehumanizes a person (no sexual slavery, eye-for-an-eye genital mutilation or regular drowning shit) but I do think that some measures should be taken against people who refuse to learn or refuse to try and improve.
  • edited 2011-05-08 21:50:19
     as long as it follows established Constitutional boundries and doesn't work otuside of the Constitution.

    The reaosn we do not deviate from that no cruel and unusual punishment thing that so many people seem to think is nonsense is because it is A. Not mentioend as a power of government in any article of the constitution. and B. strictly prohibited by the eighht amendment.
  • edited 2011-05-12 00:28:25
    no longer cuddly, but still Edmond
    To be honest, there probably wouldn't be much benefit. People break laws because some laws are stupid and the majority of morals are naive and unrealistic in real life situations. But we need death to keep the planet from being overpopulated.

    No I'm not high.
  • edited 2011-05-12 01:20:21
    Killing people should only ever be used as a last resort, never as a conscious decision.

    @Vorpy: I think eye for an eye can work, in a way. For example, you snatch someone's DVD player? Well your punishment is to 1a) buy them a new, better one, 1b) If you can't afford one, the government will provide one and you well have to "work it off" through community service or 2) Prison. 

    But I'm in no way suggesting this should be the case with personal crimes, such as rape or murder.
Sign In or Register to comment.