If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

Single-sex schools

edited 2011-05-05 16:29:16 in General
But you never had any to begin with.
I cannot, for the life of me, figure out why single-sex schools exist. Whilst reasons such as religion seem logical enough, other than that, I just can't see it. If the reason is "students will be otherwise distracted by the opposite sex", I'd call that out as ridiculous. I'm only able to speak for all-male schools, but if you have a classroom full of teenage boys, and you expect their complete attention, you're an idiot. Oh, and if you go to an all-male school, and happen to dislike sports? ...Yeah, have "fun" with that. The others sure will. Valuable lesson: Don't put over 1000 boys together in the same building, and try to make them co-exist perfectly. It's stupid. I'm just glad that I got out of it 2 years ago.

Comments

  • edited 2011-05-05 16:32:29
    Your school sucks, because high school sucks.
  • Yeah, these are weird. I think schools should be co-ed. Also, transgender students (such as a Male-to-Female who was forced to a all-boys school) would not have a very fun time.


    I used to hate single-sex schools actually because I thought they breeded homosexuality.

  • "I think schools should be co-ed."

    Why?
  • All male schools exist? I thought single sex schools only existed for females.
  • edited 2011-05-05 16:37:01
    a little muffled
    @Sammy: Because schools are supposed to prepare students for real life, and it turns out that in real life most people encounter people of the opposite gender on occasion.
  • Restricting someone's interaction with the opposite sex seems... unhealthy to me.
  • Sammy: Because cramming a bunch of people of the same sex together is bad news.


    Especially for boys. You only have to look at my all-male P.E class to see that trying to keep boys under control is impossible. Not sure if girls are the same way or not.


    And I don't think it's good to be cut off from one sex that much. I feel that it may affect the student body's view of the other sex--such as all-boys schools, I can't help but feel that misogyny breeds in them. Especially since a few dumbasses would.take it to mean that men are better than women and that's why they must be seperated.


    And the transgender thing I mentioned. And gay students would go through hell at an all-boys school, given how homophobic teenage boys tend to be.


    (If you're wondering why I'm almost exclusively talking about all-boys schools, it's because...I'm a dude, and I don't really think I'm qualified to make any judgements relating to girls)

  • I'd think for girls, the lack of a social distraction such as boys would probably cause them to focus more on their peers, for better or worse.
  • As a kid, I always hated driving past the all-girls school, because it just reminded me that I wasn't a girl and that's no good.

    This post was entirely relevant and you needed to know the information contained herein.
  • They exist so that traps (either sex) can have fun tricking everyone in the school.


  • Personally I don't think they work. in the abscense of the opposite sex they will always find something to fuck.
  • edited 2011-05-05 17:18:01
    "Because schools are supposed to prepare students for real life, and it
    turns out that in real life most people encounter people of the opposite
    gender on occasion."

    I interact with guys every day, and not just the faculty. And even if I didn't, normal people don't magically lose their ability to function around men/women after spending a few years primarily with one sex. Maybe younger kids would be stunted somehow, but involuntary single-sex schooling is daft anyway.

    "Personally I don't think they work. in the abscense of the opposite sex they will always find something to fuck."

    If you define "working" as "corraling and controlling horny kids", of course they don't. Good thing that's not the point of single-sex education, religious parents' delusions to the contrary.
  • edited 2011-05-05 17:31:34
    Loser
    Saigyouji,

    I agree with you about single-sex schools. I think they can be especially harmful for people who are unsocial and thus would otherwise not interact with people their age outside of school. It may just be that I like to have a diversity of perspectives. For example, I would not choose to go to an all-male or all-female school for that reason. I doubt they have gender segregated puppy training schools anyway so I suppose that is a moot point though.

    I have heard that single-sex schools work for some people (in terms of test scores) so perhaps it is best to take it on a case-by-case basis. I guess some people like that kind of environment. Still, I am curious as to why some like single-sex universities. I have a harder time understanding that since I would think that by that age the benefits of being with only male or only female students would decrease.


  • a little muffled
    @Sammy: So what is the point then?
  • Book larnin'.
  • a little muffled
    How exactly is that improved by segregating genders?
  • Writer, Artist, Obscure.
    No "Distractions" and less chance of sexual 'Deviancy".

    in short No reason at all ;D

  • HOMOSEXUALITY, FUCK YEAR
  • Writer, Artist, Obscure.
    And if you're a homosexual in a same sex school it just means you get twice as much eye candy as you would've in your normal school. So... win?
  • BobBob
    edited 2011-05-05 18:45:00
    Win. Epic win.

  • "How exactly is that improved by segregating genders?"


    Short answer: it probably isn't. Long answer: it's extremely difficult to determine the effect of segregation because you immediately run into issues with selection bias and inconsistent grading/achievement standards. That being said, studies have found an overall *slight* benefit to single-sex schooling at the high school level, but it's not terribly convincing. At the university level, the benefits are much more pronounced, but it's a voluntary system so self-selection kind of messes everything up.
  • edited 2011-05-05 19:05:22
    I went to a same-sex school all the way up until high school, at which point a lot of the boys there were moved to a new public school because of distracting.

    Did it contribute to my love of cock? Possibly.
  • But you never had any to begin with.
    @Mousa: Violently homophobic eye candy?

    And to make a note on Chagen's comment on transpeople, I'll say that, from experience, he's right. Not that I can talk for anyone but myself, of course.
  • edited 2011-05-06 11:16:23
    Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human
    The idea was that, in the absence of sexual stimuli, people won't become horny.

    This idea is wrong, because people become horny first and then find sexual stimuli to release their urges upon.
  • And sometimes, they take what they can get. IE. cock/cock or pussy/pussy
Sign In or Register to comment.