If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
General politics thread (was: General U.S. politics thread)
Comments
Regardless, I've noticed the phrase and the general idea of "oppressed-ness as clout" has become less and less prevalent, while saying things the right way becomes increasingly important.
Does not seem legit. Especially with;
ie they were already doing this
I get that the "Please stop reading Gender Queer to our 12 year olds" thing might be descending into a purity spiral (an outcome that I really should have seen coming) but this seems a bit off.
But also yeah there's time in the future to teach kids about naked European statues if they don't live in Europe (teenage years?).
Essentially; big media should take a break before jumping at people seeking to confirm their narratives because a lot of them might just have unrelated axes to grind.
I believe in class differences. In fact, I don't just "believe" in them, they're quite observably real.
Well yeah everyone can have problems but the issue in question was definitely not in them.
Considering that, as you pointed out, "they were already doing this", the following is particularly noteworthy: So, yes, the parents should have known this was going to be a thing ahead of time. As the excerpt you quoted notes, it's in the curriculum they follow.
Well, I dunno if it was just poor phrasing on your part, but my comment was basically just a sidenote noting that "money doesn't solve all problems", or "it's not like the rich don't have problems". I haven't read the article about the equestrian; this was just a tangential thought.
https://www.tampabay.com/investigations/2023/03/12/tampa-teen-was-racially-harassed-by-her-teacher-hes-bullied-students-years/
(Unlike what the URL name suggests, the article is more about recounting the litany of complaints against the teacher as opposed to focusing on just one complaint.)
I was like, the fella looks girlish, then I read fella was trans. I'm not sure what to make of it. The teacher does have a sort of a cross between Trollface and Emperor Palpatine look though, which seems quite appropriate.
What surprised me was that folks seemed to get riled up the most by a comment about gays in a church. I mean, after all that siegheiling in public, this is like the worst thing about a murderer were that he jaywalked.
Although the wake-up bar is an idea I gotta try out one of these days.
Tangentially, this article is also a good example of that sort of racial identity stuff I mentioned earlier. As far as I'm concerned, every person on a photo wouldn't look too out of place here, even the biracial girl. Even the hair is nothing that a good hairdresser couldn't arrange. Although, I can't really produce a wider query, so by necessity that's just me, unfortunately. But I still have this hunch no heads would be turned anyway.
Anyways I read this recently and I thought it would be of interest (particularly to GMH).
Yeah, this ain't a "key contradiction that leftists need to resolve". It's not a condemnation of public transit (or expansion thereof), or lack of policing (or leftists lol). And it's not a problem solvable by simply going heavy-handed with "enforc[ing] rules".
Here's the key question: you can arrest the drug addicts and the homeless (n.b. they may overlap but are not necessarily the same people), but...what happens after that? They don't just disappear. (Well, if you were in charge of the government, you could make them disappear, but you'd have much bigger ethical problems on your hands.)
If you don't send them to jail, then you need some other facilities to house them where you can administer drug rehab programs and mental health help and other resources needed to get people back on their feet. (And you'd also need more housing.) If you send them to jail, then that means you now need to have those resources as part of the prison system. If you do neither of these...well, what are you gonna do, drop them off at the nearest highway underpass?
On the other hand, building more housing directly produces a solution (that works on a longer timescale than simply "remove them from public transit" without thinking of the next step), which would ideally be affordable housing, but even if it isn't it still has the effect of increasing supply and stemming the skyrocketing rise of real estate. (And yes, this means doing away with various crappy land-use/zoning regulations.)
As for getting people the help they need, it's probably better to not use the jails as an out-of-sight-out-of-mind "wastebin" for stuffing any and all "undesirables" but giving people more appropriate and fitting help from other professionals who can coordinate with and support law enforcement officers by providing other expertise so that you're not burdening the police with dealing with every problem under the sun.
Would you be cool with drug rehab programs and mental health programs done by force? I would be (and am).
Not to be a complete jerk but we could just build alternative facilities so the criminal justice system isn't overburdened.
Also, this still avoids the fact that these people do commit crimes and "he's a drug addict/homeless" is a very bad excuse for not putting them in jail.
It shouldn't be abused, of course, but that goes without saying.
This, yes.
The thing with that is it raises the question of why we are putting people in jail in the first place? Sure, it exists as a deterrent to the people who aren't in jail, and also as a way to contain certain dedicated criminals who are deemed too dangerous to let roam free, but the motives and motivations of people who shoplift to feed their drug addictions are quite different.
Furthermore, and certainly a very important point: Drug addiction, homelessness, and criminal activity should not be conflated with each other. Individual people may be involved in one or more of these things, but presuming them to overlap, e.g. automatically presuming homeless people are criminals, is what got us into the problems we have today in the first place.
content warning: teen pregnancy, teen marriage, and generally depressing stuff
FYI, to get around the paywall, hold Esc immediately after, or even as, you're refreshing the page.
I actually meant asylums.
Well, forced drug-rehab and mental health facilities.
Like what GMH said but with less niceness.
I think the first and last things are closely linked, whereas the second is more about either intense mental health or depression-related problems.
*silent balk*
One of the worst things about conservatism is the intense belief in Christian values.
Speaking of, it seems rural America has like, a super-intense drug problem that somehow never comes up enough. Maybe because journalists and intelligentsia live in cities, so the city drug problem is on their minds more.
I think diet and smoking rates are also pretty bad when you spend all day making fun of "Avocado Toast Eating Elites".
I actually do think abstinence until you're 18 or so (or like, married even) is generally a good idea, and frankly I am super cool with scaring kids into it, but I'm also a kid who grew up watching all of Degrassi and knowing that contraception was an option and taht it's not super evil (for some reason, I can only remember the one time Liberty had a pregnancy scare because some forms of contraception aren't 100% effective).
Most people won't pay attention, but the author to this piece clearly did, but but also I don't mind if people do things I think are wrong if the extent is "having sexual relations before you're 18" (but like, probably do a good cutoff at 16ish anyways because come on).
sam hill on a stick
I feel like there's a dichotomy not being explored here; this Protestant aesthetic that Americans clung onto for a very long time and their inability to actually ever police their children once stuff goes awry (you'd think there would be a convenient coven to send them off to*).
*for some reason, saying this, I was reminded of "pray away the gay" camps
Author girl knows what's up (or at least her mother did).
Well I mean frankly speaking at some people they're gonna have to start attempting to wrap their head around the fact that budding romantic feelings are to varying extents related to sexuality and thus also related to reproduction and thus also the responsibilities of being a parent. Scaring, perhaps, but it's realistic to get them to think about the concerns.
I'm not so naive as to think they'll be able to wrap their heads around it all -- frankly, I'm not sure adults succeed at this either -- but having the very realistic concern somewhere in their head is probably useful.
Hence, the invention of sex ed. Though abstinence-only sex ed is just, not effective, because it's basically just trying to foist all responsibility onto personal willpower, and I think it's better to teach people to just be more cautious in general rather than to conceptualize this stuff as "resisting temptation" in just one moralistically-ordained direction.
Also, frankly speaking, you're not gonna beat the sex drive out of people, no matter how hard you try, considering that it's literally why the human species continues to exist. Perhaps alternative outlets for one's sex drive might be more useful, and incidentally, the conversation in the Animu thread brings up the notion that it may be preferable for someone to be jacking off to a fictional character than knocking up a real-life person.
(Or that's how I remember it, at least. I think they have some sort of private setting. If not, then he must've deleted the account or at least un-liked the pictures.)
it's amusing to see a story where a politician is running for an Xth term when the term limit is X-2 terms or fewer
(the actual reason is because the law was changed while he was mayor)
I think this is a bad way to think about things. There's an obvious current of stuff where people think "girly=bad" because I guess stereotypes like homemaking or interior design are associated with being intellectually disabled but Barbie worked (and works) well as the sort of character who is associated with the color pink and is also a computer coder (or whatever it is this year).
Even in the 80s, there was Career Girl, who is literally Barbie as a high-powered like... office person, and she's wearing a ridiculous Poofy Sleeve Jacket thing. It's epic.
Anyhow, what I was saying was not "girly=bad", but rather, "Barbie=girly", because they've really gone whole hog into that aesthetic.
(transcript of the toot since it doesn't embed)
Content indication: The following text is beneath a toggle-show button:
You know, I was wondering whether or not I should post about it, but I felt like this would be me complaining yet again about excessively local stuff. There's plenty of memes, but all in Polish. One I found the funnier had Putin asking one of his cronies if the Poles are now in fear that a Russian rocket hit them, but the crony replies "they didn't notice". But I don't think it's all that funny in translation, so, well, yeah.
Although, I have seen a joke post claiming that the Prime Minister just announced everyone who felt concerned by the incident will be paid out 500 PLN, and I didn't realize it's supposed to be a joke.
Thanks, but it's not my toot =P
Twitter: Best I can give you is Donald Trump Heads vs. Ron DeSanctis Stans in "Iowa Bogaloo: There was a Tornado Warning okay????"
Y'know, with all the attempts to make an insulting nickname for Ron DeSantis, I'm still surprised no one has been using "Ron DoucheAntics". It's closer in pronunciation to his actual name than any of the multiple variants I've seen, most commonly "Ron DeSanctimonious".
The saga ain't over.
Also, this is the election year, so the Party announces they're raising the monthly payout from 500 to 800. There's something amusing in that one of the most extensive experiments in universal basic income was a vote-buying trick by a bunch of populist rightie crypto-authoritatians.
An article about Elon Musk that's not about Twitter nor about his questionable political opinions. And it's not really about him per se either. Rather, it's about his companies running afoul of things like environmental and traffic regulations that, it turns out, are there for a reason.
Something dumb is happening.
Though I do not like "Pride Month" stuff, and think it should really all just go away, this is kind of just super odd.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/23/business/target-lgbtq-merchandise/index.html
Meanwhile, not like it stopped the threats from coming anyway, e.g. this batch days later: https://kutv.com/news/local/layton-target-evacuated-after-bomb-threats-reported-at-multiple-utah-stores-pride-merchandise-salt-lake-taylorsville-provo-lgbtq
Sidenote: this reminds me of the obnoxious behavior of some nutcases during the height of the pandemic response: I remember videos of people going into stores just to do stuff like trash the cloth masks. Jerks.