If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
ITT: Evergreen talks about houses and real estate
Since I have a habit of browsing real estate listings online to amuse myself, and Glenn and I have talked somewhat extensively about houses and the housing market and stuff before in various threads, I figured it was time I made a thread where I could put such things and people could discuss if they wanted to.
What I share here will generally be categorized by whether I see it as Awesome, Stupid Awesome, or just Stupid.
This enormous house in Farmington, CT is a good example of Stupid Awesome. It is currently owned by 50 Cent, previously by Mike Tyson. It's probably the biggest house in Hartford County if not the whole state, but it's utterly charmless and when you think about it, a house that big is really just kind of unwieldy. It would be better off as some kind of conference center and small hotel, or a religious retreat house, or...y'know. Something like that. It's a local legend, and has been on the market since I was in high school, or earlier...
This fairly ordinary but upscale colonial in Avon, CT is to me just plain Stupid. As in, it's the kind of house that I like to make fun of relentlessly. It's nice, it's pretty big, and it's been very well-kept, but it looks like it's barely been changed in 20 years. I absolutely love/hate when that happens. Also, the exterior is kind of odd, it's like they were trying to do the whole Tudor revival thing (and I loathe the 70's Tudor revival, btw) and then just decided to half-ass it.
Comments
The first house has a stunning setting, but the house itself doesn't grab me for some reason.
"Fiddy"'s place has a rather creepy vibe to it - a bit like the hotel in The Shining. Where on earth does he find the people to fill it up? You'd need to have an entourage the size of Louis XIV's court living with you all the time. The gym is particularly ridiculous. If you ever ran short of money you could just turn it into a paying gym for the whole town.
The third house - well, you may not like the interior design, but the day I move into somewhere like that'll be the day I know I've arrived. Probably in a re-make of The Stepford Wives or something, but still...
At first, I was like, if we had a Mystery Hunt team of like 100 people, we should totally rent out that place.
But then I realized that all Mystery Hunt really needs is one big room with lots of tables and electric outlets and preferably hard floor (so that trash doesn't get stuck in the carpets), or maybe one big room like that and one kitchen and eating area. Okay, if we're planning on an extended stay, let's have a third room filled with bunk beds or sleeping bags, and two multi-user bathrooms, for guys and for girls.
So then i realized that that 50 Cent's house...would do well to best house a supervillain and all his lackeys. I mean, it's got entertainment (at least 3 pool tables, 1.5 basketball courts, 2 swimming pools, one hot tub, and a bedroom the size of a small office building). That foyer would be great for greeting the heroes when they first come to visit...then dropping them into a shark pit below or something.
is meis from CT. (Yay my fiction...)Now, this is my kind of topic. I like the second house.
I like this. I want the additional five acres of land too, so I can extend the garden and plant a forest surrounding it. The interior decor isn't quite to my taste, but that's easily rectified.
Though I think there are better properties than that. Ideally I want a modestly-sized secluded cottage (5 bedrooms maybe) with a large garden on all sides. Not having any public footpaths or farms within half a mile would be a plus. I really like my privacy.
It has a ton of rooms. So what if the exterior looks kinda silly? I like how the interior looks neat and bright, and also has a ton of rooms that makes it easy for you if you want a change of mood. The carpet looks comfy where there's carpet. It could look brighter, given that some of their color schemes are a bit silly (such as the lattice fence wallpaper), but overall it looks okay.
However, it is also a huge pain in the ass to clean.
Hard floors, especially ceramic tile and wood, are much easier to clean but less comfy, and less inviting in the winter months.
@Ian: Compared to the houses at the start of this thread, the price is nothing :P
I have two ideas of what sort of luxury house I'd want. The first is a modest cottage with spacious and secluded grounds, and the other is a gigantic fortified estate with top-of-the line security, self-contained recreational facilities, etc.
Behold, Fairfield Manor:
It tickles my imagination just dreaming of the sorts of things one could do with that house and grounds, and alot of money. It could have its own cinema, a deluxe library, a massive forest, its own theme park somewhere (think neverland but awesome), a marina, and even a town for all the servants and bodyguards.
I liked that more.
> I like cosy small rooms with low ceilings, also old houses that have
crooked stairways or funny shaped rooms and niches in a lot of places.
I prefer high ceilings, but I also like old houses with crooked stairways and funny-shaped rooms and niches in a lot of places.
----
As for some of those huge estates...uh, dude. Imagine having to mow those lawns. Even if it's your paid servant. Those are some fucking huge lawns. With how much trouble our current yard (just about half an acre) poses to my mom, I feel like I would hate to have to upkeep that amount of land. I would rather just leave it undeveloped and let it become woods or something. Or build something on it.
I'm also not too interested in having crazy amounts of possibilities for recreation. After all it's just my own property; it lacks life. It's not like a college campus where every afternoon you will see people using the tennis and basketball courts and the track or something. It's just you there, and maybe your family if you're married and have kids. It's lonely.
If I were to have a mansion, I'd first sell off most of the accompanying land, then organize the mansion into a communal living arrangement with a bunch of friends if possible. Because having a huge living space is great for novelty value but quickly becomes lonely.
And I think y'all have smaller houses because you've got less space.
@GMH: It would take a considerable team of servants to keep the estate in working order.
I would entertain quite a few "guests", probably. Even though I'm nothing like a socialite, it feels good to extend generousity as both a tool of intrigue and merriment. Oh yeah, not to mention if you're a power-hungry billionaire the estate would not merely be a massive playhouse, but a feudal centre of power.
^^^ Sucks that the UK is right there at the bottom. I blame the crummy pseudo-"detached" houses developers keep building. There's barely a foot between some houses, and the rooms are tiny. Rip-off Britain at its finest. And people still fall for that con.
^ I made a thread about surbubia a few weeks ago. I would not want to live in a house like the ones in that picture. Everyone can see your back garden from their bedroom window, and likewise. When you go out back you don't have an idyllic view but a scene of sameish monstrosities.
I would still prefer to live in a detached house, but a decent one.
And I agree, streetview is so fun.
That said, it wouldn't give an accurate picture if we didn't compare similar neighborhoods in terms of socioeconomic status and other factors.
Re the sign at the entrance to the development - that, I think, is pretty unusual for the UK. Generally speaking, you only have standard black-on-white municipal signs for the names of roads, villages or towns. Some get a bit more ambitious. My old stamping ground, Harrow, put up a large metal arch above the main road into the town centre with the name on, but it didn't really work. I hardly noticed it was there at first.
I also think the idea of a modern housing estate as being high-class and desirable is much more American than British. If you talk about a housing estate here, people tend to think of either "social housing", probably rough, run-down and deprived, a bit like the projects in US cities, or private housing built by developers like Barratt. Those are more middle class, but they have a reputation for small, poorly-designed houses run up on the cheap to maximise profits. If you've ever heard the old folk song about "little boxes made of ticky-tacky", Barratt homes are kind of our answer to those houses.
In at least a certain part of Queens, NY, you have the following:
In high-rises
Studio condos/co-ops: up to about $120K, typically around $80K
1-bedroom condos/co-ops: up to about $160K
2-bedroom condos/co-ops: up to about $240K, typically around $200K
3-bedroom condos/co-ops: $200K and up
In low-rises, possibly with garages: Jack up those prices. A 3-bedroom low-rise condo/co-op with an attached garage: $400K or more, possibly.
HOWEVER...
The crappiest, dingiest, tiny cape from the 1950s with no improvements and shitty as hell maintenance, on the tiniest allowed lot: AT LEAST $450K.
Basic 2000 square foot house, no basement: $500K to $800K, depending on condition, lot size, etc.
A decent condition two-family house with garage: $600K to $800K.
Fucking ass.