If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

"Posting any kind of furry art gets you banned on the spot".

edited 2011-10-22 20:14:42 in Webspace
[tɕagɛn]
I'm starting to get really tired of seeing this rule on sites.

WTF is with the internet and furries? I mean, yeah, have this kind of rule for NSFW art is fine, but instantly perma-banning someone for posting SFW Furry art is just dumb. Especially when they allow art of kemonomimi (I don't really know any good term for this in english that isn't stilted/overly long), which are basically halfway to furries anyway.

It's even more ridiculous when I see other-wise perfectly normal sites throw this rule out there. I saw a site with this rule:

"Posting CP or Furry gets you an instant permaban"

Comments

  • I am Dr. Ned who is totally not Dr. Zed in disguise.
    >kemonomimi (I don't really know any good term for this in english that isn't stilted/overly long)

    Well give it a go as I don't know what that is.
  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    ^Animal ears.
  • Animal-eared people, but that sounds...awkward to me. Especially in the middle of a sentence.
  • You can change. You can.
    I thought it was people with minimal beastly traits (Like ears, fangs or whatever)
  • I am Dr. Ned who is totally not Dr. Zed in disguise.
    People with animal ears works fine imo.
    /offtopic

    Ontopic:
    Furry stuff is seen as disgusting and weird, so the people ban it on their sites.

    You'd have to look at the reasons why it is seen in such a way to get to why it is banned in a lot of places.
  • "Furry stuff is seen as disgusting and weird, so the people ban it on their sites.

    You'd have to look at the reasons why it is seen in such a way to get to why it is banned in a lot of places."

    When the same people allow what-ever-the-hell-else (like Guro, or Scat) on their sites, it comes off as strangely hypocritical.
  • I am Dr. Ned who is totally not Dr. Zed in disguise.
    Then it is just their tastes dictating their rules.
    Basically you just have to deal wit it and find other sites, or stay on that site and not post it.
  • No rainbow star
    That reminds me of how the only thing that got Gary sunk fast than furry based stuff on the Pokemon board on 4chan was scat

    ...I will never forget that image of Jirachi shitting out enough feces to make a new Jirachi D:
  • It bothers me too, and I really dislike furry porn.
  • We Played Some Open Chords and Rejoiced, For the Earth Had Circled the Sun Yet Another Year
    Speaking of furries, I always found it sort of weird that people can express so much revulsion toward furry porn and anything else involving that fetish, and then claim that the only reason they dislike furries is because they think everyone hates them.
  • Peer pressure is a powerful force.
  • I honestly don't get why furry porn gets such a bad reputation, but rape fantasies and piss fetishes just get a few weird looks.
  • Furry porn gets such a bad reputation mostly due to the connection with furry lifestylers and otherkin, rather than because of the porn itself.  At least, that's what it seems to be anyway.
  • ^ I'm not so sure - I think people have problems with the actual porn too. I mean, it's usually a bit more than Playmate of the Month or whatever. As for why other fetishes don't get that reaction on the internet (a) in some parts of it they probably do and (b) it's the "animal" element, which (irrationally or not) crosses the line for some people. 


    I don't mind those who like it setting up sites for the interested, but I wouldn't be comfortable being a member of a site with a lot of furry porn on.


     

  • edited 2011-10-23 03:16:20
    I stand on Grendel's shoulders
    I'm neutral to furry art so long as it's non-suggestive, but furry porn should not be posted outside porn websites simply because it's porn. As for porn websites not allowing furry porn, it's their site and their problem. I don't particularly care.

    I don't mind those who like it setting up sites for the interested, but I
    wouldn't be comfortable being a member of a site with a lot of furry
    porn on.


    Yeah, same.
  • Perhaps it's because in the mind's eye, a partner is still involved in rape roleplay, body modding, watersports and scat?  And furry art seems to fall in the category of cartoon porn, thus conjuring images of the autismal ronery neckbeard fapping his days away, which hits a little too close to home for many of the sites most vocal about their distaste towards furries? At least, those seem to be the popular perceptions to me.

  • They're somethin' else.
    I know some pretty vocal IRL furries, just as much as I've known some IRL lolicon freaks.

    Three guesses who's company I prefer, no prize for getting it right.swf
  • No rainbow star
    ^ I'm guessing you prefer furries, as you called the lolicons freaks
  • edited 2011-10-23 12:53:38
    I remember there was a (most likely) troll article at Busy Street once that pretty much said all furries are losers with persecution complexes who are only interested in the porn. If I actually had the drive to go back all those pages, I'd link to it here.

    Generally, I don't have a problem with SFW furry art, and though I don't really enjoy it, if furries want to yiff, then they can yiff. The porn can get freaky sometimes. The article I mentioned showed the front cover of an online furry porn mag that involved Little Red Riding Hood getting raped by multiple wolves. Not to mention Furaffinity has sections for things like Muscle, Hyper (I don't even know what those are), and Baby. But all kinds of porn can get freaky.
  • No rainbow star
    ^ Hyper is when a character has breasts and/or a penis and testicles that are at ridiculous sizes (As in big enough to hold whole people). The variant of, "Breasts and penis and testicles" is the most common
  • edited 2011-10-23 12:57:19
    ^ ...Um, thanks?

    And I'm guessing muscle is just characters having ridiculously sized muscles or something?
  • No rainbow star
    ^ That would be correct
  • a little muffled
    The article I mentioned showed the front cover of an online furry porn
    mag that involved Little Red Riding Hood getting raped by multiple
    wolves.
    Isn't that the picture Madass Alex got his avatar from?
  • They're somethin' else.
    ^ I remember that. Yeesh.
Sign In or Register to comment.