If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

The "TV Tropes vs. Wikipedia" dichotomy

2»

Comments

  • edited 2011-03-08 20:10:31
    ^^,^ It seems like that's pretty much covered on the main page though, is it not?

    I mean "We are not Wikipedia. We're a buttload more informal. We encourage breezy language and original thought. There Is No Such Thing As Notability, and no citations are needed." should be more than enough to tell people that, well, TV Tropes isn't Wikipedia and that it allows original research and doesn't require citations.
  • edited 2011-03-08 20:21:05
    OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    ^It's surprisingly common for people not to pay much attention to (or even see) the home page. Get linked to a page, click around a bit, decide to edit...
  • edited 2011-03-08 20:25:46
    I guess so.

    And unfortunately, just having something in the page editing... page... that tells people to actually read the guidelines and whatnot before editing would not really help at all.

    Since people continually demonstrate that they never actually read anything they're told to.  Ever.

    Though I'm not sure how someone would end up on, of all things, the Citation Needed page before they see the home page.
  • So what importance would incorporating citation needed into the wiki provide?
  • edited 2011-03-08 20:32:12
    Nothing.

    I'm not saying that TV Tropes should require citations.  I'm saying TV Tropes shouldn't have a page that exists specifically to say that TV Tropes is somehow better than Wikipedia for not having such a policy, despite the two sites being completely different, with totally different goals.  It almost makes it sound like tropers don't know that Wikipedia is actually supposed to be, you know, an encyclopedia.
  • Eddie himself says he hates it.

    Also, I remember reading something about a "Wikipedia vs. TV Tropes war" on there. I have always thought "the fuck, Wikipedia has better things to do than wage "war" on other sites just because they don't 100% like them".
  • Like skullfuck vandals.

    Though you've just gave me the mental image of Wikipedia being Napoleonic France against the rest of Europe.

  • I wonder how old that comment from Eddie is.
  • Entries there are driven toward this Jack-Webb-just-the-facts-ma'am sort of ... pablum.

    No spice. No opinions. A whole lot of "No!". I hope we never get like that.

    So... it's Fast Eddie who doesn't know what "encyclopedia" means?

    Well, that explains a lot I guess...
  • And yet the man is slowly but surely turning TV Tropes into a just-the-facts sort of place all for the sake of a futile attempt at keeping the peace/keeping up his unrealistic positivity ideal.

    This would make for a great Citizen Kane-type movie.

  • Also, I like Jack Webb, thank you very much.
  • Wow.

    This thread is sure filled with misguided opinions...
  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    -facepalms-

    Leaving the thread.
  • I don't get it.
  • ITT: Complaining About Wikis You Don't Like

    NOW WITH STRAWMANNING!
Sign In or Register to comment.