If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Lack of Accommodations for Vegetarians
Comments
Bacon <3
I must become a better swordsman.
It's also important to note that a major reason to cut down on meat consumption is because it takes far more resources to raise an animal on plants as opposed to eating the plants themselves, which means raising meat has a large negative environmental impact. Not sure if synthetic meat would get rid of that problem too, but somehow I doubt people will want to lose jobs to it.
I have heard people advocating for vegetarianism using that kind of reasoning and I think you described it well. I think it is interesting given that it is kind of distanced from the so-called "ethical" reasons to be a vegetarian and is more objectively based. Still, I suppose there are plenty of other behaviors that people could adopt to be more "environmentally friendly" that would also cause rather large inconveniences as well, so I can understand why that reason may not persuade everyone.
Although I can understand why Forzare and many other IJBMers may not have heard that argument from vegetarians before since from what I can tell, many people start with the "ethical" arguments first. I probably am exposed to a disproportionate number of vegetarians as well, so perhaps my perspective is skewed a bit.
Gelzo,
I figure ideally there should be accommodations, but it depends on the situation. It might not be a good idea if the inclusion of a vegetarian dish means excluding one of two meat dishes, which could make a greater number of meat-eaters unhappy.
I guess my question would be why have two meat dishes if you know you are serving vegetarians? Obviously, maximizing people's happiness with that kind of thing makes sense, but I think the drop off in happiness caused by having one fewer meat dish is fairly low, especially since it is not as though offering a vegetarian option means that no one can eat meat.
I feel like it is similar to ordering pizza for a group of people. If one person really likes sausage pizza, but likes pepperoni as well and nearly everyone else enjoys pepperoni, but hates sausage, then I think that it is reasonable to order pepperoni. Likewise, if everyone likes cheese, most people really like pepperoni, and one person hates pepperoni, then I think it should be fine to get mostly pepperoni with one or two cheese pizzas.
I guess my belief here is that putting someone in a situation where he or she cannot really eat much of anything is to be avoided.
"I think it is interesting given that it is kind of distanced from the so-called "ethical" reasons to be a vegetarian and is more objectively based."
In fact, it's the only vegetarian argument that ever convinced me.
I agree about that being an extreme example and maybe your approach to it is the right one. I am not sure what I would do if I was in that situation either. I might try to buy an extra pizza for the one who likes cheese or something.
In any event, I feel like most of the time offering a vegetarian option is reasonable and not that costly. I guess one of the main reasons why not having one bugs me is because it makes assumptions about people that are not totally fair. Plus, I think it can tend to single out people who just want to seem like part of the group and do not want to seem like they have "special needs."