I'm about to get into ANOTHER circumsision debate.

Chagen

Fuck, not again.

IanExMachina

Why?

Vorpy

Because religious debate.

Chagen

>I am mad about a San Francisco ban
>Some German guy says that the attempt to ban Circumsision was a good thing
>I FUCKING MAD

GLORIOUSLeader

Because warblegarble. 

Why do you think circumcision is a good thing? 

ClockworkUniverse

While I'm uncircumcised and don't consider being so bad, I must point out that a fairly decent percentage of males will require circumcision for medical purposes at some point during their life. Banning it, therefore, is bad.

IanExMachina

inb4 someone insults a whole section of the population with views on attractiveness regarding circumcision.

snowbull

@INUH: I have never heard anyone claim this, IIRC, even when making pro circumcision arguments. Links?

Chagen

Aaaaaaaand now I'm banned on that forum till the 1st.

GLORIOUSLeader

Good job.

Also, don't import drama. 

Chagen

Not trying to import anything.

Chagen

Wait, they did pass it?

San Fran can officially go fuck itself.

snowbull

Can I give my babies piercings and tattoos at birth too?

This is gonna be so much fun.

AHR

You can give children piercings when they are babies.

IanExMachina

^^^

From the stereotypes I see I assume it regularly does. 

snowbull

^^Hot damn, is there anything I can't do?

BlackHumor

You can't circumcise Chuck Norris.

Not because he won't let you; because it's harder than the knife.

/lamechucknorrisjoke

Chagen

Snow: There's a difference between adding useless parts to your kid, and removing useless parts from him.

Vorpy

Foreskins aren't useless. They allow oral sex to be easier and make a little sack you can pull over the head when they are about to cum.

Central Avenue

My first thought upon reading the title was, "if you don't want to get into a debate, why do it?"

Chagen

Adding useless parts: burdens the kid

Removing useless parts: frees him of the burden of bearing a vestigal organ

snowbull

@Chagen: Okay, then I seriously doubt they'll ever need those pinky toes.

Or notice it for quite a while, even.

Chagen

"They allow oral sex to be easier "

I don't know about you, but I would never, ever, suck off a guy with a foreskin.

Vorpy

I don't know about you, but I would never, ever, suck off a guy with a foreskin.

Probably because you are a discriminating homophobe most likely.

Chagen

No they just look disgusting

ClockworkUniverse

burden of bearing a vestigal organ

Um, uncut here wondering what the hell the burden is.

snowbull

@Chagen: Adding parts doesn't have to be useless. My kid will thank me for his artificial penis extension when he grows up.

Central Avenue

I don't know about you, but I would never, ever, suck off a guy with a foreskin.

How is that even an argument? It's your personal preference, at best.

All Nines

@Chagen: It's not useless, though. It's generally said, and I would be inclined to agree, though not with firsthand evidence, that removing the foreskin would diminish sexual pleasure, since you're removing a highly sensitive part of the penis.

And "they're disgusting" is hardly an argument. Like CentralAvenue said, it's personal preference. damn it, Everest, when you say you're not going to get into a debate with Chagen, you should damn well follow through on it.

IanExMachina

> No they just look disgusting

Sigh, I inb4'd and everything and you still did it.

GLORIOUSLeader

Yay aesthetics.

Because when I think of penii, I think of how pretty they are.

/not gay

//circumcised

///is fine with the ban