If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

All men are rape supporters

135

Comments

  • Aren't most humans visual in their attraction?
  • Because you never know what you might see.
    @ Edmania: Except that considering pornography to be objectification and conflating that with tacit support for rape is a fairly well-established, if hotly disputed feminist viewpoint, whereas equating male sexual dominance with sexual abuse is not.

    @ Bradamante: That's not the only possible target of visual attraction, though.
  • Of course not. But if watching porn is a natural and healthy expression of visual sexual attraction, then demonizing men who watch porn demonizes, not all visual attraction to women, but a very common part of it, since most men watch some sort of porn.
  • Because you never know what you might see.
    Note your "if" clause.  That's the contentious part, I think.
  • That's the part that she's arguing against, yes.
  • Because you never know what you might see.
    But then she's not saying men can't be visually attracted to women, only that they shouldn't watch pornography for the purpose of satisfying that attaction.
  • Ah. Good point. Now I see where you're coming from.

    She may not be saying it outright, but she may be inadvertently stifling male visual attraction.
  • "But then she's not saying men can't be visually attracted to women, only that they shouldn't watch pornography for the purpose of satisfying that attaction."

    But.....that's the entire reason porn exists.
  • edited 2011-05-20 13:28:54
    Because you never know what you might see.
    ^^ Very probably.

    ^ Yes, but if you consider porn to be a bad thing, that doesn't excuse it.

    Allow me to rephrase: I dont think she thinks men should watch pornography for any purpose, not even satisfying their visual attraction to women.
  • edited 2011-05-20 14:02:45
    I'm not sure I get it. Is she saying that men shouldn't satisfy their visual attraction to women at all? Or that we should satisfy it through means other than porn? Or something else?

    Because the former sounds quite oppressive (or coercive or imposing or whatever adjective is appropriate), and the latter sounds worse than ordinary porn.
  • Because you never know what you might see.
    By "means other than porn" I was referring to women with whom they are engaged in a loving relationship and on equal footing.
  • edited 2011-05-20 14:08:08
    When in Turkey, ROCK THE FUCK OUT

    • He is anti-abortion.

    • He is pro-”choice” because he believes abortion access will make women more sexually available.


    what
  • What do abortion and sex work even have to do with rape?
  • edited 2011-05-20 14:11:23
    ^^^ That's what I was referring to, as well.

    Maybe I'm showing off my sex-naivety here, but I'd have thought getting your jollies explicitly as one of the purposes of a relationship would be more objectifying.
  • edited 2011-05-20 14:12:44
    OK, so this is the first time I've encountered an insane feminist in a while.

    I am partly in the "porn is objectifying" crowd, and I would defend that viewpoint (although not as extreme and non gay inclusive as her) but I'm also a hypocrite, so fuuuuuck me
  • edited 2011-05-20 14:14:09
    Because you never know what you might see.
    I'm finding some of the bafflement here more mystifying than the post itself.
  • Porn is objectifying...of people who choose to be objectified. Of both sexes. So what's the problem?
  • Because you never know what you might see.
    OK, I'll try to explain, bearing in mind that I am not a mind reader and cannot give this blogger's reason for holding her viewpoint, only the general reasoning behind arguments of that nature.

    First of all, if I were to say the phrase "male privilege", what would you understand by that?

    What about the term "rape culture"?
  • edited 2011-05-20 14:19:20
    I think that both genders have privileges that the other does not. Privilege isn't limited to men. I also think that rape cultures exist, but the USA largely is not one.
  • edited 2011-05-20 14:19:43
    It's sort of complicated. It's more about the fact it could be objectifying a whole gender, okay that's a real extreme right there. It just doesn't seem right.

    ^^^ Not all porn is of people who choose to be objectified.
  • Because you never know what you might see.
    Not privileges.  Privilege.  Oh boy.  Give me a moment.

    First, what would a "rape culture" be like, if you understand something by the term, but the USA does not have one?
  • A rape culture would be one where there aren't protections like rape shield laws and such in place. Where women are expected to be covered from head to toe or walk with a man at all times to avoid rape.
  • Glaives are better.
    I suppose it would be one in which a rapist cannot be punished for his or her actions, and victims of rape are derided and punished simply for having been assaulted.

    The term "rape culture" is used so loosely, though, that simply arguing that women should exercise caution and dress modestly (in addition to the usual safeguards, like more police on the streets) gets labelled as "victim blaming" and used as an example of how America has a rape culture.

    Christ, I hate feminazis.
  • What Hatter said.
  • When in Turkey, ROCK THE FUCK OUT
    Oh, God, not another "rape culture" thread.

    In a society that has severe, strict punishments for rape, a crime that will publicly lobotomize your entire life, for the rest of that life, a rape culture does not exist. 
  • Glaives are better.
    Precisely.

    There are, however, countries (mainly fundamentalist Muslim ones, although others do exist) where getting raped can be a death sentence, and it's practically impossible for a victim of rape to get justice.
  • Exercising caution and dressing modestly is shitty advice for rape prevention.
  • Till shade is gone, till water is gone, into the Shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath, to spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the last Day.
    It's not a solution in and of itself, but I'm not sure why being cautious is bad advice.
  • edited 2011-05-20 14:45:02
    Because you never know what you might see.
    OK, so on privilege.  Privilege is the condition whereby one group has advantages over a marginalised group, and these advantages are regarded as the norm which the marginalised group fails to attain.  It's not a malicious thing and doesn't generally involve outright bigotry, but it tends to be implicitly understood as being fair and often not recognised by those exercising it.  You are right that it's possible for male privilege and female privilege to coexist in a society, but the term doesn't refer to individual privileges in the more general sense of the word, and the two can't cancel one another out.

    So in the modern Western world, men are typically regarded as the default, while women are regarded as a deviation from that (an "other"), a weaker, disadvantaged, implicitly underachieving one - this is male privilege.

    The term "rape culture", in the sense that I was using it and am about to use it, refers to a culture which does not do all it can to prevent rape from occurring, and may inadvertantly encourage or enable it without realising.  For example, the tendency to regard rape as a purely violent crime perpetrated by strangers, or the tendency to regard being raped as something shameful and humiliating, or the frequent argument that women encourage rapists by dressing in a certain way (blaming the victim).

    How does this relate to pornography?  Well, it's fairly widely acknowledged, within feminism, that pornography typically does not objectify both sexes equally.  That is, in the majority of porn, women tend to be more objectified than men; there is a greater focus on the female body, the female reactions, and so on, (and sometimes a conscious catering more towards gynephilic kinks, as well).  This is the male gaze.

    Now, this perhaps wouldn't be a problem if women weren't already typically regarded as a deviation from the male norm, but as it happens they generally are, or so the theory goes.  The argument then goes that by objectifying women to this extent, certain stereotypes and attitudes towards women are reinforced.

    This is where, potentially, rape culture enters the equation.  The argument typically goes that by reinforcing these objectifying attitudes towards women, pornography encourages men to regard women as something that can be used to satisfy male urges and pleasures.  This does not mean that watching porn makes men more likely to go out and commit a rape - rather, it means that men may form certain preconceptions of women and of sexual relationships between men and women, which causes them to be more tolerant of certain forms of rape or of behaviour which leads to rape, and which causes them to behave in a way which is hostile towards female victims of rape and women in general, and may cause some women to feel threatened or uncomfortable in the company of such men.

    Holy fucking shit, ninjas.

    Hatter... face palm.

    Nice Godwin, by the way.
  • Glaives are better.
    Exercising caution and dressing modestly is great advice.

    If you're a woman (or, alternatively, a small-boned schoolboy with silky skin) and you're walking around in a bad part of town, it's better for you to be dressed modestly, to make yourself less of a target. The same thing goes for muggings; if you're walking around a bad part of town wearing a tuxedo and twirling a cane while humming "We're in the money," then you're making yourself more of a target for a mugging. It isn't your fault when you do get mugged, but you still should have been more careful.
Sign In or Register to comment.