Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Angry Joe
As much as I dislike most angry reviewers, I can see why they appeal to people and how they might be considered "good" by their fans.
But Angry Joe, I have no clue, he's everything people hate about
angry reviewing rolled up into one unholy persona. FORCED RAGE at
things no sane grown men would yell about. Mugging the camera. Stupid
and unfunny storylines in the middle of the reviews, ect.
Maybe it's his shtick of
reviewing modern games (instead of obscure NES games the target audience is
never going to give a shit about) and his unusually polished green-screen work, but I don't think either make up for how piss-poor the actual writing is.
I'm genuinely curious to hear why people like his stuff. Really.
Comments
Humor is subjective. Duh.
Humor is subjective. Duh.
Well yeah, the subjectivity card can be used for everything. but it's lazy, and thing is, I think debates on subjective preferences can be interesting and somewhat insightful if only because they make you consider why your tastes are what they are, how and why other peoples prefer other stuff and so on.
of course, there's the issue that if I really wanted an interesting debate, I wouldn't have made a thread on fucking Angry Joe.
Vanilla forum kept bolding the entire part for some reason
and there was no way to fix it so I typed the rest of the post somewhere else and copy-pasted it. it's doing the same thing
with italics, for some reason.
Sorry IJBM.