If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Giving credit to the entirety of the human species based on what specific individuals do.
And it isn't even something like "Wow, I never knew a human could do THAT!" it's just some awesome thing everyone knew someone COULD do since like ever.
Plus it isn't said like "Look, these are examples of why humans are good, (insert what persons here did)" unless someone brings up examples of specific people as proof humanity is evil, I see it more often as "Look! A human did something cool! ALL HUMANS ROCK!"
Comments
In any case, let us look at humanity as a whole:
At least that's the negative view. Time for positives!
manipulatedconvinced to help if a story is moving enough. (otherwise we don't care)Conclusion: Humanity is the best thing ever because it has My Little Pony and Bacon. Otherwise, we kinda suck, yeah.
"In any case, let us look at humanity as a whole:"
Most of those can be traced to animal instinct, with the rest being relative to some imaginary ideal figure. Though it's baffling that people only attribute negative things to human nature. Cooperation is a huge part of survival in the wild.
I'm not personally taking credit for the discovery of Pluto, or the ascent of Mt. Everest, or Bell's theorem, any more than I'm accepting the blame for the Holocaust. But humans, and therefore humanity, did those things.
And it's not that all humans rock, it's that the human species - the basic pattern, the general human design, if you like - is capable of awesome things. And horrible things. But impressive things, as has been proven time and time again.
More environmental impact, am I right?
Because that encourages the us-vs-them mentality, which is regarded as provocative and sparks fights and rivalries.
Of course, it's also a pretty reliable way of offending liberal/egalitarian sensibilities, due to the implicit disparaging of other human groups who may have made similar achievements.
But really, since humans are a species, saying "humans are X" is more comparable to saying "crocodiles are X" or "spruce firs are X" than "Americans are X".
There's also the fact that, oftentimes, such feats are not really attributable to a single human being.
You can't really say "Neil Amstrong reached the moon", all the scientific, engineering, economical, social, political, etc. background involves thousands of years of history and possibly millions of individuals.
To think, that quote was actually a veiled jab at Robert Hooke.
^ /co/'s not dead, and MLP:FIM won't be popular forever.
If that's who I think it is (first guy on the moon) then that is an achievement most people who knew about the project thought was impossible at the time IIRC, so it is indeed something that can be regarded as an improvement to known human capabilities.
And last I checked, Hey Arnold's enduring popularity hasn't been sufficient to kill /co/ yet.