It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Category: Bullshit is more like it, but I had to go with the closest term.
Yes, I know stuff like this is either said by villains or posers that mistake cynicism for realism, and I can't really argue something that abuses the word "natural" in this way, but I'm going to try anyway. Thinking in terms of the human body, unnatural things such as viruses are rejected. So if happiness is so unnatural, then why is the pursuit of happiness the goal of so many people? If "natural" is contrasted with "artificial", or man-made, then couldn't the same be said of all emotions? What makes happiness any more fabricated than sadness or anger?
I'm guessing this is one of those "It Makes Sense In Context" things, but it sounds so ridiculous that I can't imagine it actually being said seriously.
Comments
Let me just stop you right here: I wasn't aware that the physical universe had feelings, nor was I aware that human minds somehow "invented" happiness.
Clearly, something is amiss. The BEST interpretation I can think of is that in the mental universe (there is just such a distinction in dualism), otherwise known as "mind", our "default" state is one in which we perhaps akin to emotionally neutral, and not happy. By "unnatural", the person *actually* means that it's a deviation from the default status. In this case they would be accurate, because happiness and pleasure exist as *rewards* and thus we are never fully content with out lot in life; thus we are convinced to always press forward to get a little bit more happiness, as we watch it dangled in front of us and chase onward.
Appeal to nature is a fallacy in itself anyway.
Besides, what does "unnatural" mean? Opposed to "natural" - in what way? Man-made? But it is the natural capabilities and inclinations of humans that allow such things in the first play. Human-made constructs, whether material or mental, are no more unnatural that anthill or beaver dam.