If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
I think I made Rule 34 of my own, in development game, without even thinking
Many of the creatures are very intelligent (and some have human levels of intelligence). One of the entries talks about how one of the reptiles, in its second form, which is bipedal, sometimes gets into relationships with humans, with extra, just for fun canon details explaining how the relationships can be more than platonic
I made canon furry rule 34 in my own game as bonus, "This will NEVER be stated in game so is word of god," material
GOD DAMMIT INTERNET STOP PERVERTING ME!
Comments
It would be akin to, say, Satoshi saying that Pikachu likes to get it on with Golem in their spare time. Not in the game and can be ignored in favour of actual game material that says that they wouldn't go near each other due to different egg groups
>.> If I want a, at most, T for Teen rating, I can't include that stuff which drives me mad because I am obsessed with making every little detail, right down to what the damn penis of male Crysilk would look like (although that's also partly due to, "If it is popular, it would attract a good level of smut, so may at least have something that goes, "Look, it is like this. You may ignore it but damnit I am not going to have any debates about if x creature and y creature can actually breed if they were real and how they would!")
Actually, would material released by the creator but not condoned by the publisher of the game itself count as canon, or merely word of god?