If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
How I keep almost all of my music at 320kbs.
My PSP is running out of space, and fast.
Damn you, minor audiophile tendencies!
Comments
Encode it as 192kbps MP3 when you're putting it on something that doesn't have a lot of space.
/failure of an audiophile
You think that's crazy? Try spending weeks downloading a 21-part bootleg series (which is divided into multiple files apiece, BTW, so you have to spend 20 minutes waiting between downloading individual halves of discs on a 4-disc set), and then once that's done, painstakingly renaming them and adding the proper ID3 tags in order to bring the files up respectable aesthetic standards (some files of which there were no ID3 tags or actual filenames, for that matter), for over 1,200 files, some of which I couldn't get the right information for anyway.
Given a choice, I would encode my music at about 160 kbps.
Oh, but obviously, don't convert your MP3s into FLAC. That will just result in something that sounds the same but has a huge filesize for no reason. And don't convert your existing 320kbps MP3s to a lower bitrate, because compression artifacts add up, so it'll end up sounding worse than the bitrate should suggest.
Can you save them to a portable hard drive?
Like I said, for all your music that's on a portable device, keep it at 192kbps or 160kbps or something. Even at lower bitrates, you might not even be able to tell the difference if you're listening on crappy headphones or while there's a lot of noise around you or whatever
I listen on Skullcandy in-ears. They block almost almost all extrernal noise and have very good speakers, so I'm gonna notice any imperfections. And I would love to have some Sennheiser HE 90 headphones. Just so you know, only 300 were made and they retail for $14,000.
And I'm a minor audiophile. I can tell the differnce between bitrates very easily.
And it's not like you need to store all of your music on your PSP/iPod/whatever anyway. You can just put whatever music you might actually listen to on it, and keep the rest on your computer/some other hard drive.
I'm not a fan of this. I like having all of my music on tap. In addition, music makes me want to get up and walk around, no matter how slow it is, and I can't do that with a computer.
Clearly I just need a media player with a larger hard drive.
Dammit Apple, where my 10 Terabyte Ipod be!?
I'll sometimes like sound-shutting-out headphones if I'm in an apartment or something where I can't just fill my room with sound, but I much prefer computer speakers. Or standard $10~$30 desktop speakers.
Now, for some exceptionally great music I might want to try them out on surround sound.
I get this a lot too. I usually resolve it by keeping one out of my ear. I'm actually doing it right now.
And they probably don't make those audiophile headphones like that. I'm talking about the $700+ ones.
But I see where they're coming from--those more open headphones slightly replicate surround sound systems, which are always the best--nothing sounda better than the surround sound system in my mom's Mercedes. The Black Parade is awesome in it.
I'm not a very big audiophile...