It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Ok, quick summary:
Thomas Beatie is a transman who you may remember from the "pregnant man" stories a few years back. Now he is being refused a divorce because he "didn't prove" that he was trans when he was married. Despite the fact that he got married in a state that doesn't recognise same-sex marriage in the first place.
Comments
You know what, diss me as much as you will, but the first thing that came to me was, like, just a couple of years ago, this could make a background gag from a comedy film, and of the more absurd kind. Like that scene from Mel Brooks' Airplane 2, about man changing his sex and marrying himself.
Wait, so the judge refuses to end a marriage because (according to the judge) the marriage isn't legal?
I...what?
It...kind of makes sense, in an insanely stupid way. Basically what he's saying is "I can't divorce you because I'm not willing to acknowledge that you were married at all."
Again, it's hilariously stupid, but I can see his train of thought, I guess is what I'm saying.
Yes, but that isn't what he's asking that judge for, I think.
No, but I suspect the judge wouldn't be in favour of that either.
True. I'm just relaying his internal logic :P