If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

The "should we put an actress category" argument on Wikipedia

2»

Comments

  • Definitely not gay.

    Hm, right. Let's just gloss over that.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    >ability to follow reasonable orders


    >people in public restrooms



    I repeat.


    Men have to put up with the same thing.


    Seems kind of... unfair, to expect men to put up with it but oh no not women, right?

  • Definitely not gay.

    Maybe it's just a good idea to carry around a bedpan and do your business when no-one's looking

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    Or just forget about the whole separate bathrooms thing and just deal with people occasionally peeing on seats.

  • Definitely not gay.

    Your solution does not involve the possibility of flinging shit at people. Therefore, invalid.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    Aaand this is the point where I groan in disgust and leave the thread.

  • edited 2012-12-17 09:36:53
    Definitely not gay.

    But seriously, I see now that maybe I was a bit too dismissive of the concept of unisex restrooms.


    Sorry for acting so condescending towards it...


    Aw hell, I just regret this entire exchange. I said a lot of things I'm not too proud of.

  • "you duck spawn, refined creature, you try to be cynical, yokel, but all that comes out of it is that you're a dunce!!!!! you duck plug!"

    So, this thread is about toilets now, or did just cease to be? BTW it gets me thinking: how lucky our world is, if the biggest problem is that... hold on, SEXISM AHEAD... the toilets ARE SEPARATE. I mean, if you can convince me building separate toilets is big enough an expense that it's cheaper to just tell everyone to get used to the idea of unisex toilets, that would be some reason. I mean, I know I am a reactionary crazy evil fundie exploiter of the people rabid wacko, but really, is it that much of a problem that toilets are separate and some people probably don't mind it? It's, like, that time at TVT when some guy tried to argue that having kids (just the fact that they're born, mind you) is an act of oppression, except that time it was only he fighting the oppression, and everyone else, trying to wrap their minds around his ideas.


    @Eelektross: saying things you're not too proud of? Heh, I know the pain. And yet, here I am, jumping in for a chance to have everyone piling up on me. Or whatever. Pfffhht. =)

  • "I will grant you two wishes; one for each testicle."

    The main reason I'm against the actress category is that we can just have them be in an actor category and a female category at the same time.

Sign In or Register to comment.