If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

Only seeing worshippers of Norse and Greek gods/goddesses in most fantasy (especially DnD) stuff

edited 2012-12-04 07:29:30 in Media
Definitely not gay.

I dream of the day when clerics of Serket are just as common as paladins of Thor or Athena-worshipping wizards.


All of my friends' DnD campaigns have only involved these two pantheons, with one campaign's antagonist being Hades. I only remember one campaign involving one other religion, and that was Generic Thinly-Veiled Christianity. 


I know that they're probably too lazy to come up with anything else, but this still upsets me. 

«1

Comments

  • Don't most DnD settings have their own pantheons, inspired by a variety of mythologies?

  • But you never had any to begin with.

    ...Why would people in a totally different universe worship those pantheons in the first place?

  • edited 2012-12-04 07:36:16
    Definitely not gay.

     


    Don't most DnD settings have their own pantheons, inspired by a variety of mythologies? 

    I tried convincing them to use Lolth once, but they wouldn't have it.


    ^ Someone clearly hasn't heard of suspension of disbelief.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    Suspension of disbelief only takes you so far, man.

  • Definitely not gay.

    Using that logic, why would humans even exist in a totally different universe anyways?

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    To provide a necessary reference point for consumers of the media.

  • Definitely not gay.

    It's still easy to assume that humans in that setting came up with Zeus/Odin and pals all by themselves.


    It seems improbable, but improbable in a universe filled with impossible is easy to shrug off.

  • One foot in front of the other, every day.

    Audiences will more readily accept the impossible than the improbable. 

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    It's pretty fuckin' silly though.

  • Definitely not gay.

    It's pretty fuckin' silly though.



    Magic and dragons are also pretty fuckin' silly. They're also still integral parts of the game.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    They are part of the premise of the game. When you look at the game, you think, "Okay, magic and dragons are a part of this."


    That is okay because they are purely fictional; we have an implicit agreement with the author of the work, accepting their reality within the context of the story.


    Real-world concepts and deities existing in a fictional world without the context that brought them into being (for a given value of 'brought into being') in our world, though? Well, there was nothing in my agreement with the author about that; suspension of disbelief has been broken.

  • Definitely not gay.

    without the context that brought them into being (for a given value of 'brought into being') in our world



    Why isn't it OK to assume that the context that created said myths was still present in the setting?

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    Because there's no fucking Vikings. There's no mythology, there's no Valhalla, there's no Rangnarok. There is just Odin and Thor and a bunch of other gods, stuck in there because it's cool regardless of how little sense it makes.


    Consider it this way: Have many people have you seen talk about how implausible that Clark Kent can hide his identity merely through putting on a pair of glasses? Those same people are fine with Clark being able to fly and punch hard enough to break rocks, but they can't accept that Clark can hide his identity merely by putting on a pair of glasses, because that's not part of the implicit agreement with the author there.

  • Definitely not gay.

    Because there's no fucking Vikings.



    It's easy to assume that there is at least a Viking-equivalent (like dwarves or something) that takes the same role.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    Well, no. Dwarves would worship Moradin, the God of Dwarves and one of Dungeon and Dragon's core Greater Deities.

  • edited 2012-12-04 08:08:37
    Definitely not gay.

    Point.


    But DnD isn't restricted to one setting. In any given setting, there can always be a Viking-equivalent race.


    Note that my friends were operating on a homebrew setting.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    Those are homebrew settings, though; not part of the default Greyhawk setting, or any other official settings. However, the Norse gods are part of the official setting, meaning that Wizards of the Coast added them in without adding in any context for them, as opposed to simply allowing people to homebrew in Norse gods for their Viking-equivalent race.


    Which leads to Saigyouji's earlier question; why would people in an alternate world worship these deities in the first place? It breaks my suspension of disbelief because, even within the bounds of the alternate world the game takes place in, there is no context for these gods, and thus no reason for them to exist.

  • Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human

    Alternatively we can just assume that the fantasy deities in question are expies with the same name as their source characters.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    In that case, why?

  • Definitely not gay.

    we can just assume that the fantasy deities in question are expies with the same name as their source characters.



    So you're saying that (for example) there's this god named Odin who has a lightning spear, two ravens named Hugin and Munin, and only one eye because of a deal with a giant. Said Odin also has a son named Thor and an adoptive brother named Loki, who is a mischief-loving giant. And that this Odin is completely different from the Odin we know.


    Fair enough.

  • Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human

    Okay, fine, Captain Ersatzes.

  • edited 2012-12-04 09:27:56
    It's always annoyed me whenever they do that; not only is it incredibly lazy, it is also incredibly boring.



    Even more boring is when fantasy uses modern religious ideas and concepts and reactions in medieval or otherwise pre-industrial equivalent settings.



    Although the worst offenders must be those who just give names of gods and their purviews in perfectly-matched, neat little tables without any color or fleshing out.



    Mix! Match! Stir it all up and give me something random! Give me controversies and disputes! Show me fundamentalism, show me heresies, show me deviant faiths and alternative ideas! Those are much more interesting.
  • edited 2012-12-04 09:23:43
    Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human

    It's not necessarily lazy, if you want a partly pre-generated setting so you can focus creative energies on something else.


    I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing when people copy other works in their own.  As someone who may or may not be a historical figure said, good artists borrow, great artists steal.

  • Sure, steal. But steal and jumble and stitch until the only ones who know what you've stolen are those paying attention.



    Don't take it all in one place. It lacks finesse.
  • Definitely not gay.

    I wanna see stats for Serket goddammit


    I mean what's cooler than a scorpion-goddess

  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    Two scorpion-goddesses.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing when people copy other works in their own.  As someone who may or may not be a historical figure said, good artists borrow, great artists steal.



    The difference there is that in stealing something, you're making it your own.

  • I'm a damn twisted person

    Eelektross - this is a problem... how? If you want to play a cleric of Serket, just slap together some domains and ask if that is okay and you should be golden. Who gives a crap if other people are boring unless you have to play with them?

  • edited 2012-12-04 11:53:40
    Definitely not gay.

    Who gives a crap if other people are boring



    This thing is endemic of most fantasy stuff as a whole, not just campaigns. It appears in lots of fantasy media I consume, which is really boring. It gets really tiring when you find it everywhere.

  • One foot in front of the other, every day.

    This thing is endemic of most fantasy stuff as a whole



    So you start a thread about two of the most overexposed pagan pantheons in context of the most boring set of fantasy settings. 

Sign In or Register to comment.