It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
First of all, before I start, I know that labels like this are ridiculous, but I'd just like to know where to classify myself, just in case I'll end up needing it.
Second, please don't turn this into an abortion debate, because those always end up lovely.
Namely, I dislike both the extreme pro-life and pro-choice positions. I don't believe that life begins at conception, but neither that it starts with birth. There is a certain point in the development of the fetus, around the 24th week, when it already develops primitive forms of conscious thinking. This is the point where I believe the fetus becomes a human and, as such, gains an unequivocal right to life and the mother loses the right to abort at will, unless continued pregancy poses an immediate danger to the mother's health.
Comments
I'd classify that as Circumstantial Pro-Choice.
Wait, how do you feel about rape?
Embryos and fetuses that are a product of rape can be aborted at will until the 24th week, just like the rest of them.
You sound like someone with a nuanced position that shouldn't be basing your decisions on orthodox sides.
I'm both pro-choice and pro-life.
...okay, I just don't define human life as beginning with conception. It begins sometime later, probably before natural birth, but I'm not sure.
And I don't think it's right for me to force my judgement calls on this issue on someone else.
I feel as though I should not have an opinion on the issue, since I'm not a woman.
So, I've kind of made it a habit to actively avoid developing one. Maybe that's copping out, I dunno.
Also, I solve practical problems. Not problems like, "when does a human life begin?", because that would fall within the purview of your conundrums of religious and philosophical wan--I mean, ponderin'.
I think from now on, I'm going to replace instances of "-wank" as a suffix with Ponderin'.
All prog-rock is just guitar-ponderin'
Mmm...I'm technically a pro-lifer, how stuck up your ass you gotta be to make up that label anyway? Anti-abortion is far more specific.
What vandro said. The Anti-abortion part. I'm completely pro-choice.
Anti-abortion may be more technically correct, but it looses some of the righteous indignation of STANDING FOR THE LIVES OF OTHERS. Granted that bit always tends to get undercut when pro-life folks support the death penalty and various wars.
Yeah, I hate that they are never called out on that.
They always are.
Okay, I think I might, I hate that they are never introspective when they are called out on it.
Heh, google Charlie Fuqua if you want to see the most extreme case of this dissonance.
This is the important thing, though.
is this the most hilarious paragraph i've read today
there is no "what the fuck am I reading" macro in the world severe enough for my reaction to that paragraph.
With regards to abortion, pro-life, pro-choice, I firmly believe in Mitt Romney's singing voice.
It feels weird when you have the same opinion as a bunch of people who have completely diferent views in other matters and this is the group that most people relate to your opinion.
^^^^ Well, children who haven't been born yet have not yet sinned.
But once they have...they're fair game.
^^^^^ Oh, for God's sake...
He's a fundie. Don't expect fundies to make any logical sense, all they do is parrot the aspects of the Bible that they personally like, and those are usually the worst ones. The Bible, being a collection of scripts by various authors, is extremely inconsistent, and you can extract pretty much any conclusion from it.
True facts, but still, there are not enough "WHAT."s in the world.
Someone threw this up on IRC: http://io9.com/5958187/what-happens-to-women-denied-abortions-this-is-the-first-scientific-study-to-find-out
A relevant case.
Does a beating heart means it's alive? Does that matter since the fetus died anyway, except it took the mother with it?