If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

Clockwork Universes

24

Comments

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    That sounds like a good plan.

  • edited 2012-08-04 01:11:09
    Definitely not gay.

    I liked B/W's gameplay the best. Sure, it seems more linear than other games, but Pokemon isn't fucking Fallout. It was never intended to be open-world.


    The story and setting are horrid, though.

  • edited 2012-08-04 01:12:47
    OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    I think the series' gameplay is probably best in HG/SS, myself.


    I'm in agreement with regard to B/W's story being pretty bad, but I actually quite like the setting. It feels organic; it's the little details that do it for me, like Durant and Heatmor.

  • Definitely not gay.

    HGSS did have its own problems, though. Like level distribution (which was carried over from G/S, so there's that)

  • Give us fire! Give us ruin! Give us our glory!

    B/W had that problem after the endgame too, going from low 50s to 60+.


    On the other hand, that just registered a "challenge accepted" for me.

  • edited 2012-08-04 01:19:55
    OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    ^^Yeah, that's a fair point. But I think it has the best engine.


    Now, if we're talking about the best generation in terms of what it contributed to the series, that has to be III. The world design led to a lot of the game being pretty dull to work through, but the discontinuity between the Game Boy and Gameboy Advance let the designers go nuts making overall systematic improvements, and started the tradition of remaking the earlier games.

  • edited 2012-08-04 01:20:34
    Definitely not gay.

    B/W had that problem after the endgame too, going from low 50s to 60+.



    Fuck I remember that shiii



    Now, if we're talking about the best generation in terms of what it contributed to the series, that has to be III.



    3 had the best setting/atmosphere, but WATER ROUTES EVERYWHERE

  • edited 2012-08-04 01:20:23
    If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    I liked B/W's gameplay the best. Sure, it seems more linear than other games, but Pokemon isn't fuckingFallout. It was never intended to be open-world.



    It might not be open-world, but it's also not as exploratory as the previous games. Above, I explained why i think exploration is good for Pokemon games.


    Black and White still did alright at that, though.

  • Give us fire! Give us ruin! Give us our glory!

    ^^^Personally, I wouldn't rate Gen III all that highly, then again I'm biased because I never liked Hoenn.

  • edited 2012-08-04 01:23:19
    Definitely not gay.

    I think that HMs, properly used, would add to the sense of exploration Cygan's talking about. 


    Of course, their main purpose was to check if you had like how many gym badges.

  • edited 2012-08-04 01:27:35
    OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    ...I think I just figured out a major problem in my article.


    Exploration applies to the Pokèmon series in two different ways. There's the directed exploration of advancing through the plot, seeing more of the world and discovering new Pokèmon, and there's also the more freeform exploration of looking for secrets and stuff. When I revise the article, I need to talk about that distinction.



    Personally, I wouldn't rate Gen III all that highly, then again I'm biased because I never liked Hoenn.



    Hating Hoenn is irrelevant. Gen III is the one where they had to completely rewrite the engine. If they hadn't done that, the series would still be working off a modified version of the Red/Blue engine. Disaster.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    I think that HMs, properly used, would add to the sense of exploration Cygan's talking about. 



    y-



    Cygan



    :|


    Anyway, yeah, they would. They're really under-utilized, but they'd need to be redesigned to not suck in order to be properly useful.



    Personally, I wouldn't rate Gen III all that highly, then again I'm biased because I never liked Hoenn.






    Many of these glitches and design features wouldn't be fixed until the third generation, which is why the third generation is often considered to be the major jumping point for the series. It was a game filled with bad decisions in its own right, but it fixed many of the old bad design decisions- in fact, they pretty much had to, as I do believe they had to redesign the game from the ground up due to the shift to the GBA.


  • Definitely not gay.

    Another major rewrite was the phys/spe split.

  • He who laments and can't let go of the past is forever doomed to solitude.

    I always loved Hoenn...

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    Another major rewrite was the phys/spe split.



    It wasn't as much of a game changer as changing Special to Sp. Atk and Sp. Def.


    Gen III also marked the transition to 3D environments. And trick bikes.

  • Give us fire! Give us ruin! Give us our glory!

    Oh, and probably the best thing. They made the box system not stupid.

  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    The phys/spe split theoretically could have happened without a complete engine rewrite, but I'm not sure separating the special attack/special defense IVs and EVs could have.

  • edited 2012-08-04 01:44:25
    Give us fire! Give us ruin! Give us our glory!

    They split Special into 2 stats in Gen II anyway. Eelektross was talking about the Physical/Special split for attacks.

  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    They did, but to preserve compatibility, the two stats shared one IV and one EV.

  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.

    I am waiting for an update :|

  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    Yeah :/


    I was out of town without the ability to edit the post for several days, and haven't been able to finish yet. Hold on; I'll get it done soon.

  • Give us fire! Give us ruin! Give us our glory!

    Buffer, man. Buffer.

  • edited 2012-08-14 11:52:36
    OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    The plan is to get maybe five or six articles out, then go back and fix them all up as a sort of relaunch thing before I try to spread word of the site beyond this forum. While I'm doing that, I'll be able to build up a buffer.

  • You can change. You can.

    My english is failing me right now


    what's a buffer


    a queue or something?

  • a little muffled

    Yes.

  • One foot in front of the other, every day.

    In a more general sense, a buffer is kind of like the concept of a shield, but taken outside the literal shape and technical usage of one. A buffer is really any device or technique used to protect something. For instance, the driving rule that says you should have at least the length of a car (and preferably more) between yourself and another vehicle could be considered a buffer, because it aims to protect drivers from error by increasing the time they have to react if something goes wrong. 


    On a more literal level, you could look at the edges of bumper cars, which are designed to react in such a way that they deflect impact (which has the side effect of being super fun, too). 


    Or, you know, shields. Bucklers. Fortresses. A good sword parry. All that fun stuff. These are buffers, too. 

  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    a buffer is kind of like the concept of a shield, but taken outside the literal shape and technical usage of one



    You know, if someone had presented that sentence to me utterly without context, I would have known that you'd written it.

  • One foot in front of the other, every day.

    <_<;

  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
Sign In or Register to comment.