If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

Reviews that don't mention extremely important details

edited 2012-06-03 12:37:05 in Media
I clench my fists and yell "anime" towards an uncaring, absent God, and swear solemnly to press my thumbs into Chocolate America's eyeballs until he is blinded, to directly emasculate sporting figures, to beat the shit out of tumblr users with baseball bats, and to quietly appreciate what Waylon Smithers being gay means to me.

Generally reviews for movies/music are okay and reviews for games are... uh, slightly less than okay. But sometimes, I see a work that has something extremely important within its context that isn't mentioned in any reviews at all.


Mass Effect 3 is the obvious example, but I'll go with another to prevent this from becoming a discussion about gaming journalism: Battleship.


Yeah, it's a pretty bad movie. The acting is okay at best, terrible at worst, the plot isn't terribly engaging, and it's mostly a dick-waving context for the CGI artists that are upset there won't be another Transformers movie. But looking at the reviews for it, not a single one mentions the rather important fact that it's an anti-war film and not, as many people expected, a US Navy propaganda piece with aliens.


For one, the aliens are hardly unsympathetic; their technology allows them to distinguish between civilians and soldiers. It's used completely idiotically in the movie, but it's definitely something the writers thought about. Secondly, there is a scene meant to evoke either 9/11 or some other terrorist attack where it occurred through miscommunication between the two sides. Which is ballsy for a Hollywood blockbuster, if executed rather incompetently. Finally, the song they play over the credits is freakin' "Fortunate Son." So my question is: why did not a single review mention any of this?   

Comments

  • You can change. You can.

    Because it's a badly played out subtext. And even then the movie's third act does involve typical American patriotic sentiment with the whole Last Dance of the USS Missouri thing.


    I actually did enjoy the movie because I got to watch the Friday Night Lights cast having fun. All two of them. 

  • I clench my fists and yell "anime" towards an uncaring, absent God, and swear solemnly to press my thumbs into Chocolate America's eyeballs until he is blinded, to directly emasculate sporting figures, to beat the shit out of tumblr users with baseball bats, and to quietly appreciate what Waylon Smithers being gay means to me.

    Hey, I never said it was done well. I just found it odd that not a single review mentioned any of it at all. 

  • You can change. You can.

    Well, yeah, but it turns out that reviewers are fallible beings too and if the subtext doesn't play out well, they don't notice it. Hell, I didn't notice it in my review and I'm still doubtful that there even is that subtext in the first place.

  • edited 2012-06-03 13:52:14
    MORONS! I'VE GOT MORONS ON MY PAYROLL!

    Maybe the reviewers just didn't feel it was worth mentioning. Just because there's a poorly delivered anti-war screed doesn't make the movie any less shit. It just makes it shit and pretentious.


    Besides, having an anti-war message in a run and gun CGI-splosionganza speaks to me of wanting to have one's cake and eat it too.

Sign In or Register to comment.