If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
The problem with nerd fiction
Comments
Let us bring up The Sandman again, then. We have next to no information about the setting, except for what little snippets we are given. This actually helps the story, because a large part of the narrative is about your interpretation of the work and what is going on.
In this case, further defining the setting would actually take away from much of what makes the story good.
I think the problem here is that while it's quite possible to observe that something is often good, no solid rule saying that one thing will improve any story will work.
To be honest, I've had a great deal of difficulty enjoying works of that nature. Trying to find solutions to unanswerable questions is an exercise in frustration in my experience. It's one of the reasons I didn't like reading The Giver in English class, though the story was very well-written and thought-provoking, without being able to figure out the context I just lost interest entirely. So many of the people I talked to said it was a great book, but with so much left unknown about the setting I found it utterly forgettable.
This thread started pretty deep down and now it's in sitting with Judas in the jaws of Lucifer.
World-building doesn't automatically make a story great, nor does it automatically diminish it.
It's not about what a story does, but how well it does it.
You don't fuckin' say.
This thread wishes it was Judas in the jaws of Lucifer, trust me.
It's actually Cassius!
I was thinking Brutus, but that works too, I guess.
Poor Cassius, nobody ever remembers him.
Trollolololololololololol
Also, plagiarism is bad Myrmidon
Even when it's from this asshole?
How deliciously offensive. It's like chan chauvinism with a monocle.
Found it.
I find it funny that a man who tries that hard to sound like a refined yet acid-tongued gentleman has people with usernames like "Blumpkin McNiggerfart" running around on his personal forums.
Incidentally:
I'm not sure how "we have to start back" accomplishes that :P
And yet here you are, talking about it and explaining why you didn't like it. :P
>Looks through thread on a lark
>Person calls Umberto Eco a hack.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WHAT BALLS DO THESE DUMBFUCKS HAVE?
I doubt the guy who wrote that has actually read much fantasy fiction. It's how he goes from bitching about dwarves and elves being a necessity in fantasy fiction to talking about a fantasy series that has a grand total of one dwarf, by which I mean a human being with dwarfism and no elves.
Also:http://mpcdot.com/forums/index.php?/topic/2847-do-paranoids-dream-of-electric-jews/
NOPE
Two wrongs don't make a right.
No, but two rights make a left.
Isn't it three rights?
Whatever, this guy is still a jackass.
Doesn't make plagiarizing him righteous, though.
It's not like I'm submitting his ideas as a paper, I was just copy pasting him to pull an April Fool's joke.
Oh, OK.
And it worked, apparently.