If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

Politicians in Wisconsin trying to claim that being a single mother counts as abusing a child

edited 2012-03-25 13:16:04 in Politics
No rainbow star
...



I'm putting this in Politics JUST in case

Comments

  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    -_-

  • No rainbow star
    A reply in less than half a minute?



    Are you obsessively refreshing, INUH?
  • >"something that's politically incorrect but has to be said in our society"


    Fuck you.

  • edited 2012-03-25 13:18:57
    OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!

    No, I'm just that good.


    And it didn't take me long to type that.

  • a little muffled

    It makes sense in a twisted sort of way. A lot of social conservatives claim that gay couples shouldn't be allowed to adopt children because children can only be raised properly by a man and a woman. But by that very same logic, being raised by a single parent should be even worse.

  • edited 2012-03-25 13:52:21
    I clench my fists and yell "anime" towards an uncaring, absent God, and swear solemnly to press my thumbs into Chocolate America's eyeballs until he is blinded, to directly emasculate sporting figures, to beat the shit out of tumblr users with baseball bats, and to quietly appreciate what Waylon Smithers being gay means to me.

    God forbid a gay single parent try to raise a child.


    edit: Wisconsin Lawmaker Wants Women to Remain in Abusive Relationships.


    ""If they can re-find those reasons and get back to why they got married in the first place it might help," he told a local news station.


    Yes, ladies. Try and forget the fact that he is beating you. For the sake of your children (who will grow up far more emotionally devastated from an abusive household than a single parent household). 

  • edited 2012-03-25 13:58:39
    Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human

    > wisconsin lawmaker


    Is whoever this is a state senator up for recall?


    ...


    > Representative Don Pridemore


    Damnit.


    > If they don't grow up with married biological parents, Pridemore says, "kids tend to go astray."


    Oh what the fuck now.  Even adoptions are bad.


    > Grothman, for his part, continues to defend his controversial bill. Now, though, not only is single parenthood a factor in child abuse, women in particular are to blame for it.


    > [Glenn] Grothman (republican state senator from a blood-red district)


    1. Oh, it's that douchebag again.  As in, the same guy who called the protesters slobs back in early 2011.


    2. STOP USING THE GREAT NAME OF THE SQUIRE OF CYRUS, YOU ASSHOLE.

  • Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human

    I just started a thread on OTC about this, seeing as I couldn't find another one with the same topic.  Here's the text of the opening post, reproduced:


    ----


    Remember Wisconsin state senator Glenn Grothman, who called the early-2011 protesters at the state capitol "slobs"?  Well, he's been involving himself in controversy again.

    https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/related/proposals/sb507

    (Yes, this is approximately month-old news now.  If a thread already exists for this, please let me know.)

    Senate Bill 507, which requires the Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention Board "to emphasize nonmarital parenthood as a contributing factor to child abuse and neglect."

    * http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/wisconsin-bill-claims-single-moms-cause-child-abuse-011200419.html Shine from Yahoo article on this issue
    * http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/02/glenn-grothman-wisconsin-law-single-parenthood-child-abuse_n_1316834.html Huffington Post article on this issue
    * http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/07/glenn-grothman-unplanned-pregnancies_n_1327940.html Huffington Post article on Grothman's response to this issue

    Note 1: This bill did not pass, and the Wisconsin State Senate is not currently in session.  I am not sure whether this means the bill is dead.

    Note 2: Grothman cites studies that have shown that kids are about "twenty times" more likely to be abused if they are living with single parents.  Actually, according to Politifact, it's just one study, and the study finds that the "twenty times" difference is between kids living with married biological parents and kids living with single (as in unmarried) parents and their partners.  Glaringly, there is nothing about single parents who do not live with any other adults, which this bill seems to target.

    This may be because Grothman provides the following as his reasoning:

    Wisconsin state senator Glenn Grothman (R-West Bend) said "unwanted or mistimed" pregnancies are the “choice of the women” who should learn "that this is a mistake.”

    Grothman recently introduced Senate Bill 507, which would formally consider single parenthood a contributing factor to child abuse if passed into law. During an appearance on the Alan Colmes show Friday to discuss the bill, Grothman hit at women who have children out of wedlock and chastised American culture for encouraging "a single motherhood lifestyle."

    "There’s been a huge change over the last 30 years and a lot of that change has been the choice of the women," Grothman said, noting that he thinks "we should educate women that this is a mistake."

    "I think when you have an epidemic of this great proportion, people are not so dumb that it’s surprising when they get pregnant," Grothman said of "unwanted or mistimed" pregnancies. "I think people are trained to say that ‘this is a surprise to me,’ because there’s still enough of a stigma that they’re supposed to say this."


    ----


    So yeah, it turns out this isn't quite Pridemore's fault first, it's Grothman's fault.

  • I'm a damn twisted person

    I'm not sure what pisses me off more. The fact that I was raised by a single mother and I know how much horseshit this all is, or the fact that these guys are legislators in my state.

  • edited 2012-03-25 16:46:17
    Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human

    The second one, because you can't change the fact that some people will believe this horseshit, but you can (to varying extents) change how much of a soapbox they have.


    Unfortunately, Grothman evaded the recalls by being a Republican in a very red district.  There are a few more recalls coming up soon if you want to find other ways to cockblock him.


     


    Oh, just for kicks, Grothman has never been married or had children.

  • edited 2012-03-26 01:29:27
    Diet NEET

    Does the bro have any evidence for this other than the word of his preacher? I mean, at least have some statisticians cool up a survey with loaded questions and correlation-is-causation in order to back up such a bill.

  • Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human

    Check out the link to Politifact that I posted.  While it (sadly) rates his statement as "true", read the details: He based it on a study that found a 0.5% rate of child abuse in families with married biological parents and 9.9% rate of child abuse in families (if you can call it that) with a single (as in, not married) parent living with 'eir partner.

  • Champion of the Whales

    Well the insanity doesn't stop in Wisconsin does it?

  • edited 2012-03-27 13:54:51
    Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human

    Not until Scott Walker leaves office and the Republicans lose control of the state senate during a legislative session (they're currently tied due to a resignation but the senate is not currently in session).


     


    And in the longer term, not until the recent fad of ultra-conservatism recedes.

  • I'm a damn twisted person

    You know what pisses me off most about Walker's supporters? The second you try to show them you have plenty of well researched proof he is a bad governor they don't want to listen. Blah blah blah anti union sentiment from people who are sick of union dues and don't quite get that why without something like unions or collective bargaining to force businesses to stay in line, worker exploitation just becomes outrageous.


     


    Okay I'm more angry that they never let my cite sources or bring up info against Walker or other things. It's like the whole "well that's your opinion and this is mine" mindset shuts people's brains down to the idea of examining the freaking situation and information.


     


    Bluh, just venting about politics with friends and acquaintances. 

  • Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human

    > You know what pisses me off most about Walker's supporters? The second you try to show them you have plenty of well researched proof he is a bad governor they don't want to listen.


    That's basically them seeing everything as either on their side or against their side.


    No amount of throwing facts at people with that attitude is going to change their opinion.


    Think of it like those videogame enemies where, if you hit them a normal way they put up a shield and you do no damage no matter how many times you keep on hitting them after that.


     


    I suggest:


    * instead of thinking of convincing them directly, simply hint at how the policies are bad, when they come up in contexts other than politics.  Don't do it like a drive-by shoehorned mention, but reference Walker's policies only when they're conversationally appropriate.  And after you do this, don't continue this topic.  Just give people some time for the thought and the fridge logic to sink in.


    * If you are going to confront them directly, ask them to fill in the details for you.  This might not work as well since Walker's policies tend not to be the sort of completely unrealistically crazy shit that tea-partiers usually aspire to (such as no taxes, ever), and depends a lot on accepting facts that, while, they simply come to dismiss, such as the fact that there's far less voter fraud than disenfranchisement.


    * when talking to these people, take their personal perspective and explain why something would affect them or someone they know negatively.  This, of course, requires a bit of prep-work on your part.


    * when they complain about a particular problem that one of Walker's policies supposedly aims to solve, ask them whether the policy could create a different problem.  Remind them that no policy is perfect, and you're going to have some of both types of problems, and if they're a policymaker they're going to have to decide NOT how to stamp out problems entirely but rather where to strike a balance between the two.


    ** if they still don't acknowledge that pushing things too far toward one side could be a problem, choose your questions to lead them to an acknowledgement that a problem like worker exploitation can exist.  I think it's best when you lead them to the acknowledgement through their own answers to questions rather than simply throwing a bunch of your own arguments at them.  If you do the latter, they can just claim you're stringing things together.  But if they string things together themselves...

  • edited 2012-03-27 20:40:58
    Loser

    Sorry, I made a mistake here.

  • Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human

    Hey LouieW, sorry about not continuing the PM conversation we were having earlier about Wisconsin politics.  I know a lot's been happening there, but I've just been too busy with a stack of applications upon applications.  That said, you can see my thoughts on the matter in my posts here and in the Wisconsin-related threads on the TVTF--there's nothing I would have said to you that would be different anyway, as I don't know your political opinions but you know mine, and you can clearly see the reasoning that leads me to those opinions.

  • Creature - Florida Dragon Turtle Human

    Oh, just wanted to link one of my posts over at TVTF on this particular issue: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13327068680A34405800&page=2#33


    Here I explain the flawed logic behind what seems at first glance to be a good idea.

Sign In or Register to comment.