Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
Comments
From what I've seen Cthugha seems to be Nyarlathotep-sexual so I wouldn't call her bi. It's sort of interesting that instead of a harem the would-be stalkerish paramour has another would-be stalkerish paramour. Not in any way that changes the fundamentals of the show, though unfortunately.
And I'm giving way too much thought to a shitty moe anime.
/u/ has lied to me
That's what you get for reading a board that isn't /tg/.
Need I remind you of the /tg/ rape thread?
/tg/ is full of bitter misogynists. It's not as bad /v/ but it's still there.
Basically I'd rate /tg/ as worse than /co/ in that regard but better than /v/ or /a/.
In any case if I remember the thread Nova's talking about I think the contention was the assumption that she'd fall for generic whatshisface's cock which so far she's regarded him disinterest. Her only real interaction with him was
A) trying to kill him so she'd have Nyarlathotep for herself.
B)Promising whatshisface she'd take Nyarlathotep away once their mission was was done to have her for herself.
^^ Was that just the standard "elf slave wat do" or what?
>reading /tg/ unironically
>like...clicking on the threads
>unironically
why are you doing this to yourself are you depressed
You do realize one of the people you're talking to is me, right?
I don't actually know what happens in the show, remember, not having seen it. But yeah, the thread was talking about how Cthulga was going after the guy because Nyarlathowhatever told her to. The assumption was that it would succeed because it's a pretty generic show.
Thread about sex slaves. But woops, it wasn't you I raged about it to.
Basically, it went on for something like 150 posts, with people talking about why it was morally acceptable in the context of the Greyhawk setting to take prepubescent girls as your sex slaves and why it was okay for your GM to make you a slave and sell you for sex even if the player objects to it strenuously.
You know the answer to this.
I wonder sometimes if I should just quit joking forever.
I think /tg/ is one of the better boards on 4chan, but no one should ever forget that it's still a board on 4chan.
That doesn't sound like the /tg/ I know -- or rather, I can't imagine that thread existing without it facing strong discouragement. Most threads based on sex slavery tend to get saged, ignored or criticised to high hell. It's telling that sex slavery threads became a thing but /tg/ got its shit together and worked against them, apart from the intelligently trolly ones that phrased the question in other terms (which are usually met with some variation of "We've been had. Well done, OP").
In fact, there's been a strong cleanup in /tg/ of general misogyny and, tentatively, objectification, as much as that can be done with a large audience of male nerds with more awareness of the details of the 3.5e Monster Manual's contents than knowledge or interest in politics. Sometimes you get threads like that, but at the risk of moving the discussion towards the dramatic, it's kind of like SA characterising the TVT userbase (or us) by cherrypicking bad forum members, posts and pages.
More could be done along those grounds, but anonymity means that no-one has to fear any social repercussions whatsoever for having awful opinions. Along the same lines, though, the fact that /tg/ has been able to clean itself up despite its previous situations without action tied to social pressure says a lot.
I can only see moral relativists agreeing with this.
But this is right out of the ballpark, since it's almost universal opinion in /tg/ that anything that makes your players legitimately uncomfortable (unless it's a horror game) is a no go. If nothing else, it breaks a core rule of a fun roleplaying session, which themselves are basic rules of decency and social interaction.
I don't doubt that this was a thread, but I do doubt that /tg/ at large would condone such a thing. At the very least, the fact that the thread made it to 150 posts tells me that there was some kind of argument, which means that it was not a well-held view. In fact, it may well have been a troll thread designed specifically to raise /tg/'s ire, especially given the hate levelled at "X slave wat do" threads, GM action that removes player agency and the general facepalminess towards stereotypically neckbeardy behaviour.
The basic argument was that morals differed in the time that the Greyhawk setting was lifted from, and that, as laws already differ a lot (i.e. murder and self-defence laws)and slavery is generally acceptable (as a plot device for the most part), there would be no real reason to not take slaves for yourself. There was also mention of slavery in the context of Leadership.
The two threads I can remember reading, this one and the one I did go to you about (the one that involved contracting with a devil and the devil reneging on the deal) disagree with that, but I don't lurk enough to really get a feel for that.
For what it's worth, I'm pretty sure that it was a troll thread (at the very least, the person who started the thread was a namefag and I'm pretty sure that several of the approving responses were the OP samefagging). There was controversy when the GM-player-slavery-thing was brought up, which exploded the thread and caused it to be deleted within less than an hour of creation.
hot as all fuck, man
wat
Damnit, didn't resize properly. I'll just link it.
http://images.4chan.org/d/src/1336022574036.png
(Technically SFW, despite source.)
If you're linking from 4chan and actually want people to see it, it's a good idea to rehost the image somewhere else, like Imgur or Dropbox.
Similarly, you can post the image straight up. It will automatically resize it to fit within the thread, and people can click it to make it go to full size, so unless it's absurdres, you're in the clear.
Of course, that one was absurdres, so I just halved the image size.
Thanks.
^The only proper response:
One punch! One punch!
Above: Pony Centipede?
I do cry "everytim" I see this, but for different reasons.
I sure cry evertim at it. *qq*