If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE

I agree with this entry on the TVTropes mirror wiki.

edited 2011-05-02 09:29:11 in General
Morgan Freeman is God
From the Mirror Wiki's Small Name Big Ego page:

>Some of our critics may think it petty that we list Fast Eddie from the original TV Tropes wiki as an example of this trope. Not that being a petty and controlling with a website is anything remotely new or rare, but the original TV Tropes site isn't some obscure forum or bad fansite. It's a massive source of information on tropes and works in all forms of media, and the fact that someone this controlling, petty, and flat-out egotistical runs it is disturbing. You could defend Eddie's policy of mandatory positivity and increasingly tight grip by saying he's trying to protect the site from the overwhelming negativity and bile of internet culture, but you would have to ignore the fact that he basically makes the site his bitch. He will lock and delete pages because he doesn't like the edits (90% of locked pages), he doesn't think it's funny (LOLcats, Memento), to appease advertisers (just about anything that sounds pervy), or for reasons he's not even entirely sure of (Something Awful, which he later wrote off as a "troll target", because sure, why the hell not?). And as if that wasn't bad enough, look up "TV Tropes 403". Fast Eddie really does deny all access to the site if he perceives an infraction (or, as he would probably put it, "being a troll"). As bad as the staff of many sites can be, not even the most egotistical of man-children usually go this far.

I AGREE with this entry. I wouldn't go so far as to call him an "egotistical man-child," but he's certainly been headed in that direction as of late.

People respond to me saying this by posting "U Mad" images or arguing with me for daring to say that FE's been overstepping his authority.

Basically, IJBM that everyone seems to be so willing to step aside and let Fast Eddie take away everything that made the wiki good.
«13

Comments

  • "Basically, IJBM that everyone seems to be so willing to step aside and let Fast Eddie take away everything that made the wiki good."

    He's the absolute owner of TvTropes. Opposing him is useless, as he can just ban you, and even if he doesn't get out the banhammer, why should he listen to those ignorant masses anyway? Clearly his site must become what he wants it to be....the interests of the userbase be damned.
  • Stop using the site, then. You'll never convince Fast Eddie to see things your way, but you can stop contributing. The wiki is nothing without its editors.
  • edited 2011-05-02 09:36:27
    OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    IJBM: People thinking that "the interests of the userbase"="what a subset of the less than 1% of the site's visitors who edit want to put on the pages."
  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    ^ Agreed.
  • The Sonic Series Wiki Curator of TvTropes
    What INUH said, basically.
  • You can change. You can.
    Pretty much that, yes.
  • no longer cuddly, but still Edmond
    Eh.

    I don't like his policies and I usually don't mind throwing a hissy fit. I seem to recall even arguing with him directly a few times (god, how have I not been banned yet?). But honestly sometimes his policies work out for the better and he actually gives you more leeway than his reputation suggests.

    I mean, I posted a fic where it was implied that Twilight Sparkle raped Pinkie Pie, and that fic is still up. And sex is one of the things he's supposed to have issues about, so....
  • Morgan Freeman is God
    Though Fast Eddie does at least listen to other people's opinions, he also tends to be very stubborn when it comes to policies, and won't budge an inch.

    I think probably the only way TVTropes policy is going to change is if someone more reasonable buys the site.
  • edited 2011-05-02 09:44:13
    If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    And he hasn't deleted the Lust Game, despite the fact that he has a no-other-sex-threads rule in place, because some users like it.

    Why is this a problem?
  • Meh, better criticism can be found elsewhere.
  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    ^^^He does back down about some things. Just not the specific things you keep saying will ruin the wiki if he doesn't back down on them.
  • Morgan Freeman is God
    >IJBM: People thinking that "the interests of the userbase"="what a subset of
    the less than 1% of the site's visitors who edit want to put on the
    pages."

    If that's true, then I couldn't care less what the majority of the userbase thinks. If my interests aren't represented, then I will fight the admins to the end of the earth.
  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    Hahahahaha
  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    Um...you pretty much killed the validity of your own argument dead just there.
  • That was egotistical of you.
  • Morgan Freeman is God
    Call it selfish, but I don't see how the majority of the userbase should be allowed to influence policy if nearly all of them are ignorant morons.
  • OOOooooOoOoOOoo, I'm a ghoOooOooOOOost!
    ...

    So, your ideal TV Tropes would be run by a completely uncompromising admin, but one that just happens to agree with you on every possible issue?
  • Morgan Freeman is God
    Most people's definition of genius is "thinks like me, but more so."
    Scott Adams
  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    No. My definition of genius is someone who challenges my own views and makes me think.
  • edited 2011-05-02 09:56:12
    You can change. You can.
    ...See, here is the problem. Eddie has shown time and again that he cares about his userbase. He listens to us and when it comes to big decisions, he asks for our opinion (Special Efforts, anyone?) 

    Just because he doesn't please you doesn't mean he's an egotistical bastard.

    And honestly, the wiki you have described before annoys me.

    My definition of genius is someone who can make a good point and explain his views. Don't care if I agree or disagree with him.
  • Morgan Freeman is God
    I do appreciate when people challenge my own views and make me think, but it's hard for me to still take them seriously if that thinking reaches a conclusion that's different from theirs.
  • We Played Some Open Chords and Rejoiced, For the Earth Had Circled the Sun Yet Another Year
    A witty saying proves nothing.
    - Voltaire
  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    Now take that philosophy ad apply it to your own argument from any of our POV's.
  • Kichigai birthday!!
    Famous person quotes are valid arguments
    -
    George Best
  • ^ Win.
  • If you must eat a phoenix, boil it, do not roast it. This only encourages their mischievous habits.
    Everything quoted on the internet is verifiably true and totally not made up on the spot.
    - Abraham Lincoln
  • ☭Unstoppable Sex Goddess☭
    Your baseless complaining is very annoying, in a bad way GuyInWhite. Your Bawwwgrudge against TV Tropes and Fast Eddie's actions is laughable, considering you rarely edit it at all, and mostly use the forums from what I've seen in my time there.

    Also the TV Tropes Mirror Wiki is the New Ryal ED when it comes to bashing Fast Eddie, it be sad.
  • edited 2011-05-02 10:23:02
    Mexican fag
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
    Samuel L Jackson
  • Oh look who is complaining again.  What changed now it sucks this time?
  • "IJBM: People thinking that "the interests of the userbase"="what a subset of the less than 1% of the site's visitors who edit want to put on the pages.""

    That's a trap every editor on the wiki falls into. GuyInWhite doesn't know what the majority of readers want, and neither do you.
Sign In or Register to comment.